$IBIT Bitcoin Spot ETF currently has two gaps, one above and one below, and the market faces an interesting question: will the upper gap be filled first, or will the lower gap be closed first?
From a technical perspective, these two gaps represent a tug-of-war in the market. If the upper gap is filled first, it indicates that the bulls continue to control the momentum, and the price is likely to break upward; conversely, if the lower gap is quickly filled, it may signal an upcoming correction.
The key still depends on trading volume. Gap theory suggests that the market tends to fill these price voids, but the order in which they are filled determines the subsequent direction. The current question is not whether the gaps will be filled, but the timing and sequence of the filling—this directly impacts short-term trading opportunities. It is worth continuously monitoring $IBIT's volume and price action.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropAnxiety
· 01-11 15:01
The gap theory is back... To be honest, the question of whether to fill the upper or lower gap first sounds much simpler than actually executing it.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-10 19:56
the gap sequencing here is giving me serious behavioral indicators... volume profile gonna tell us whether this is accumulation theater or genuine breakout momentum. watching whale wallet clustering around support levels rn ngl
Reply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-09 14:07
The gap theory is a well-worn topic; the key still depends on whether the selling pressure can be withstanded.
If this wave truly fills the downward gap, retail investors will have to cut losses again...
If volume and price don't cooperate, even the best technical analysis is useless.
Two gaps up and down? I just want to know when I can break even.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-08 16:01
The gap theory is back again. To be honest, this method has limited use in the crypto world... I've heard too many times that filling a gap means a drop, only to see the market rally afterward. Isn't that awkward?
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 01-08 16:01
The gap theory is back, but to be honest, this time it feels a bit far-fetched—if both the up and down gaps appear simultaneously, whoever fills them makes money, right?
I've seen this kind of volume-price game too many times; in the end, it's still the big players who call the shots.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 01-08 16:01
ngl this gap situation is literally like deciding which course gets served first at a tasting menu... volume's gotta be the sommelier here picking the direction, fr
Reply0
StealthDeployer
· 01-08 15:58
The gap theory has been around for so many years. To put it simply, it's all about volume; without volume, everything is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-08 15:56
The gap theory has been overused; ultimately, it depends on how the big players dump the market.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 01-08 15:47
It's the gap theory again. Will it really fill this time? Feels like I'm waiting for the fill every day.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-08 15:43
Gaps will eventually be filled; it all depends on who acts first. This is a game of strategy.
$IBIT Bitcoin Spot ETF currently has two gaps, one above and one below, and the market faces an interesting question: will the upper gap be filled first, or will the lower gap be closed first?
From a technical perspective, these two gaps represent a tug-of-war in the market. If the upper gap is filled first, it indicates that the bulls continue to control the momentum, and the price is likely to break upward; conversely, if the lower gap is quickly filled, it may signal an upcoming correction.
The key still depends on trading volume. Gap theory suggests that the market tends to fill these price voids, but the order in which they are filled determines the subsequent direction. The current question is not whether the gaps will be filled, but the timing and sequence of the filling—this directly impacts short-term trading opportunities. It is worth continuously monitoring $IBIT's volume and price action.