2026-01-08 15:31:49

Recently, Bitcoin prices have stabilized, and traders' attention is gradually shifting from short-term fluctuations to more rational capital allocation and risk management. As market participation increases, more and more BTC holders are looking for a balance point—one that allows them to maintain exposure to Bitcoin while also accessing on-chain DeFi ecosystems for financial operations.

The emergence of this demand reflects a trend: simply holding coins no longer satisfies some users who want to utilize their assets more efficiently. Traditional options are limited—either hold onto BTC passively or sell it to participate in DeFi with other tokens. But both paths have issues: the former yields zero returns, while the latter involves the risk of selling the coin.

The industry already has teams working to solve this pain point. For example, by launching BTC-denominated vault products, allowing holders to access the on-chain financial world without selling their Bitcoin. How does it work? Users deposit BTC, and the system provides corresponding exposure certificates, enabling them to participate in Bitcoin price appreciation while also engaging in lending, liquidity mining, and other DeFi operations.

The significance of these products lies in breaking the traditional binary dilemma. Regardless of market fluctuations, capital utilization becomes more efficient, and risks are more controllable. For mature investors, this structured approach is worth paying attention to—especially as the Bitcoin ecosystem continues to mature.

BTC0,14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller

· 16h ago

Selling plans again, really? --- Sounds pretty good, but is it safe? --- There’s a third way between holding on and selling coins, I didn’t think of that --- Leverage certificates sound like an extra layer of risk, I don’t really buy it --- Wait, isn’t this just the same logic as wBTC? Same soup, different spoon --- High capital utilization = high risk, don’t be fooled everyone --- I just want to know who will pay the bill if this kind of product runs away --- Damn, someone finally said it, just HODLing isn’t really interesting --- Structured plans... sound complicated, complexity means you can’t escape when things go wrong --- The BTC ecosystem is perfect? Haven’t seen anything reliable yet

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 01-10 09:58

Sounds good, but I still feel there are risks involved. Is it really possible to completely avoid the risk of selling coins by exchanging BTC for certificates and playing DeFi? These products are good, but the key is whether the project team is reliable. What is usually hidden behind high capital utilization? But this idea really hits my pain point; holding coins is too boring. A win-win situation, but I'm just worried about the "appearance" of a win-win. I need to do more research on the logic of open exposure certificates. Speaking of which, choosing the right platform is still essential, or it could be another scam. It feels like the market has already started to differentiate; retail investors and institutions are playing very differently. This wave of adjustment might actually be a good opportunity for big players to deploy.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBro

· 01-10 09:36

Listen, isn't this just the nicely packaged "I'll help you earn with your coins"? Is the risk really more controllable? Why do I feel like there's an extra layer of counterparty risk? --- Same old story, can liquidity mining yields beat the risk of selling coins? I wouldn't believe it even if you paid me. --- Wait, could exposure certificates also be inflationary? Something just feels off. --- The real issue is that no one wants to simply HODL anymore; everyone wants to make money. I understand this demand, but who bears the product risk? --- This is what the Bitcoin ecosystem should be doing, but it depends on whether the team is reliable. Not everyone has the reputation like MakerDAO. --- Honestly, it's just trading with a different skin; don't be fooled by the narrative. --- Interesting, but I want to know when this system will be hacked or run away.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 01-08 16:02

Sounds good, but can these kinds of products really achieve zero risk? When smart contracts have bugs...

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-08 15:58

Basically, it's about wanting to have both fish and bear paws, but the risks are still so high. It's interesting, but are these kinds of products really reliable? Another seemingly perfect solution, but what's the reality? Breaking the two choices? Sounds too ideal, there must be pitfalls. Instead of messing around with these, it's better to just HODL and wait for appreciation. Everyone wants returns but doesn't want to take risks; there's no such thing in the world. I've heard a lot about these structured products, and in the end, 99% of them become arbitrage tools. Feels like there's a new way to cut the leeks again? The BTC ecosystem is well-developed, but do users really understand these vault products?

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 01-08 15:57

Sounds good, but is the exposure certificate really safe? Has the smart contract been audited?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-08 15:53

Sounds good, but the real question is who will guarantee the risks of these certificates? --- Another solution to "choose one," well, I bet five bucks someone will get caught in a trap. --- It sounds nice, but it still depends on whether the smart contract is reliable, otherwise it’s just another nightmare of liquidation. --- High capital utilization? I'm more concerned about when we can avoid all this complexity. --- Locking BTC in DeFi to earn interest sounds tempting, but brother, this is just a nested doll. --- Impermanent loss indicates this plan isn't risky enough to make me fall into a trap; it needs more difficulty. --- Has the contract passed the audit? Don’t tell me there’s another one-click wipeout trick. --- I just want to know, is the liquidity of this "exposure certificate" really good? --- Playing with leverage again, be careful not to lose everything.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-08 15:53

It sounds like a vault within a vault—can it really beat inflation? --- Another "want both" product, in the end, it still depends on whether the smart contract is reliable. --- I've seen this trick before—it's just spreading out the risk, not truly eliminating it. --- NGL, I’m a bit tempted to try, but I need to see the audit report first. --- Feels still too good to be true—why can it satisfy two demands at the same time? --- The question is, how to ensure liquidity? Will it be able to exit smoothly in a bear market?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-08 15:48

Sounds good, finally there's a product that can solve my dilemma. In my opinion, this idea should have been thought of a long time ago—want to earn but don't want to sell coins. Indeed, an intermediate solution like this is needed. The BTC vault set is quite interesting, essentially allowing you to both keep your exposure and harvest DeFi yields? If the risk control is well executed, this could truly change the way coin holders operate. The problem is whether these protocols are reliable. I always feel that this type of product ultimately cannot escape the risk of running away; no matter how structured, you still have to trust a third party.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 01-08 15:37

Same old story... Sounds like locking BTC in a vault can both take and give? Why do I always feel something's off? --- Putting BTC into certificates for DeFi? That just adds another risk source, and you have to trust smart contracts... Never mind, I'll just keep holding tight. --- It sounds so good, but how is the actual user experience? Is it really better than direct lending? --- Finally, someone is analyzing this issue, but I want to see the historical performance of such products before making a judgment. --- It sounds complicated. Why not just leverage on a CEX... --- The logic isn't flawed, but who guarantees that the "exposure certificate" won't become the next Luna? --- Increasing capital utilization means taking on more risk. There are no free lunches in this world.

View OriginalReply0