When evaluating blockchain networks, the market usually follows a certain proportional pattern. To illustrate with a simple example: when comparing a Layer 1 blockchain with its flagship ecosystem token, the valuation gap reveals some interesting phenomena. Using the token's FDV (Fully Diluted Market Cap) as an indicator, ETH clearly demonstrates this dynamic — its trading price is approximately 101 times the valuation of the main ecosystem projects built on it. This ratio is not arbitrary; it reflects how the market prices the underlying infrastructure versus the applications built on top. Understanding these "normal market ratios" is crucial for identifying valuation deviations from historical patterns. When a project breaks this pattern, it indicates either being severely undervalued or a market pricing discrepancy, warranting in-depth analysis.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
EPIC Abnormal Phenomenon Analysis
When evaluating blockchain networks, the market usually follows a certain proportional pattern. To illustrate with a simple example: when comparing a Layer 1 blockchain with its flagship ecosystem token, the valuation gap reveals some interesting phenomena.
Using the token's FDV (Fully Diluted Market Cap) as an indicator, ETH clearly demonstrates this dynamic — its trading price is approximately 101 times the valuation of the main ecosystem projects built on it. This ratio is not arbitrary; it reflects how the market prices the underlying infrastructure versus the applications built on top.
Understanding these "normal market ratios" is crucial for identifying valuation deviations from historical patterns. When a project breaks this pattern, it indicates either being severely undervalued or a market pricing discrepancy, warranting in-depth analysis.