The debate over the four-year cycle of Bitcoin has recently heated up again, with opinions in the community divided into two camps.
One camp believes that this cycle theory has already become invalid. Their reasoning is straightforward—ETF inflows of $57 billion have completely changed the structure of market participants, and the traditional cycle patterns naturally no longer apply. However, the other camp insists that the cycle's vitality is far from as fragile as thought, and they point out a detail that is quite intriguing.
Looking at specific data: on November 21, 2025, Bitcoin drops to $80,524; going back two cycles, on November 21, 2022, the bottom price was $15,460. The same date, two cycle bottoms. While the probability of such coincidence seems random, its repeated occurrence is hard to explain away. From a historical pattern perspective, this timing does have a certain subtlety.
Currently, the market is focused on January 2026. There is a legislative plan related to the structure of the crypto market that will be formally reviewed on January 15, and this policy milestone is very likely to become another key point in this cycle.
Whether ETF has changed the game or if the rhythm of history still persists, perhaps the policy outcome this month will provide an answer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 8h ago
Hitting the bottom twice on the same day? How could that be a coincidence... Either the cycle is really still alive, or the market is much smarter than we think.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 01-09 00:41
Two bottoms on the same day, how clever is that... But speaking of ETFs, can they really break the cycle? It still feels like there are some things that can't be surpassed.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 01-08 16:02
Two bottoms on the same day? This is definitely not a coincidence, there's something to it.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 01-08 16:00
It's really incredible that they dropped on the same day. This is no coincidence.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-08 15:56
Twice at the bottom on the same date? The probability is just too outrageous, it feels like the market has some kind of mysterious rhythm.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 01-08 15:40
Falling to the bottom twice on the same day? This coincidence is a bit too intense, feels a little like mysticism.
View OriginalReply0
token_therapist
· 01-08 15:36
Hitting the bottom twice on the same date? The probability of this being a coincidence is really hard to believe... The market isn't that random; either the cycle is still alive, or January's policies can truly make all the difference. Bet on the policies.
The debate over the four-year cycle of Bitcoin has recently heated up again, with opinions in the community divided into two camps.
One camp believes that this cycle theory has already become invalid. Their reasoning is straightforward—ETF inflows of $57 billion have completely changed the structure of market participants, and the traditional cycle patterns naturally no longer apply. However, the other camp insists that the cycle's vitality is far from as fragile as thought, and they point out a detail that is quite intriguing.
Looking at specific data: on November 21, 2025, Bitcoin drops to $80,524; going back two cycles, on November 21, 2022, the bottom price was $15,460. The same date, two cycle bottoms. While the probability of such coincidence seems random, its repeated occurrence is hard to explain away. From a historical pattern perspective, this timing does have a certain subtlety.
Currently, the market is focused on January 2026. There is a legislative plan related to the structure of the crypto market that will be formally reviewed on January 15, and this policy milestone is very likely to become another key point in this cycle.
Whether ETF has changed the game or if the rhythm of history still persists, perhaps the policy outcome this month will provide an answer.