Liquidity providers on DEX platforms often see better returns when fees flow directly to them alongside token emissions. The advantage becomes clear when you compare models—some platforms combine swap fees with governance token rewards, keeping APR more predictable and stable. In contrast, protocols that depend heavily on native-token incentives face a different challenge: APRs tend to fluctuate wildly as token prices move. When emissions are the only yield source, downturns hit harder. So the real edge? Protocols that diversify reward sources—blending protocol fees with token distributions—tend to offer LPs more consistent income streams regardless of market conditions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 01-11 14:27
To be honest, the dual-track reward model is indeed much more reliable than just token emission... but it still collapses during market downturns.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000vip
· 01-11 10:22
ngl, this is the right way. The dual-track system really provides more stable returns. Relying solely on token rewards will eventually lead to a crash.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 01-09 20:39
Really, the dual revenue model is the way to go. Relying solely on price appreciation is too fragile; it collapses at the first dip. It's still best to combine fees and emissions for stability...
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-08 15:59
To be honest, the double-layer profit model is indeed attractive, but the key is whether the project team is genuinely sincere. Talking about diversified income is one thing, but actually allocating the fee sharing properly is the real key. Many projects just use this as a pretext to harvest profits from investors.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHuntervip
· 01-08 15:49
The design of directly routing fees to the LP wallet is really clever, much more stable than pure token incentives.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 01-08 15:44
It sounds like the fee sharing model is more stable, and relying solely on token incentives can indeed lead to issues. But can this theory still hold up in a bear market?
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMinervip
· 01-08 15:44
The true LP earning logic is that simple... Directly pocket the fees rather than relying solely on price support is much more stable. Look at those projects that only issue tokens; when the token price drops, the entire APR collapses. It should have been designed this way all along.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearchervip
· 01-08 15:34
Fee sharing with LPs is indeed comfortable, much more stable than protocols that rely solely on token incentives.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)