2026-01-08 15:34:55

Early blockchain regarded "full transparency" as a core belief, which indeed helped build trust in decentralization. The problem is that when blockchain tries to enter the financial sector, this logic begins to break down.

Financial systems require information isolation, compliance boundaries, and controllable risks, rather than exposing all transaction details to the sunlight. This is a practical contradiction—you want to trust, but you can't see everything.

Dusk's approach is not to deny transparency but to change its definition. Using zero-knowledge proofs, this technology allows the network to verify whether transactions and contracts are executed according to the rules without revealing any sensitive information. It sounds a bit complex, but the effect is: trustworthiness remains, and data privacy is preserved. This is almost a necessary condition for scenarios like securities trading and asset management.

More interestingly, Dusk has built-in compliance logic at the protocol level. Audit and regulatory rules can be implemented in code, making audits feasible once authorized. This "verifiable and controllable" structure gives blockchain the first real possibility to integrate into the existing financial system.

Many projects pursue faster and stronger performance metrics, but Dusk instead focuses on practical usability. It is not a public chain born for experimentation; its goal is to become a stable, long-term financial-grade infrastructure. This positioning is quite clear among similar projects.

DUSK5,31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleInTraining

· 01-11 04:32

Zero-knowledge proofs are essentially a case of wanting everything, and finally someone has figured out this path.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 01-10 06:33

Oh wow, someone finally addressed this issue clearly. The belief in transparency is already outdated. Just being visible isn't enough; it also has to be usable. Dusk's approach to zero-knowledge proofs is quite interesting. Can trustworthiness and privacy really coexist? I remain skeptical. Compliance coding... sounds great in theory, but in practice, it's a whole different story. Projects focused on practicality are indeed few; most are still just hyping concepts.

View OriginalReply0

BTCBeliefStation

· 01-08 16:01

Finally, someone has spoken about this. The whole idea of transparency is really outdated; finance needs some privacy space. Zero-knowledge proofs—who would have believed in this a few years ago? Now it’s definitely a way to solve the problem. Dusk’s approach is pretty good; it’s trustworthy and privacy-preserving, much more reliable than those projects that boast about being open and transparent all day. Writing compliance logic at the protocol layer? This guy really wants to shake hands with traditional finance. But let’s wait and see. Talking on paper and actually running a business online are two different things.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 01-08 15:59

Transparency and privacy really are a vicious cycle. The early group of idealists have now been proven wrong by reality. Zero-knowledge proofs sound mysterious, but if they can truly be applied to financial scenarios, that would be truly revolutionary. But to be honest, will regulatory authorities really buy into Dusk's compliant, code-based logic? Focusing on usability rather than pushing performance to the limit is a clear-headed approach, much more reliable than projects that only boast about data. Let's wait and see how they proceed. Financial-grade infrastructure is not just talk.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-08 15:56

The balance between transparency and privacy, Dusk's approach is indeed different. Zero-knowledge proofs in financial applications are the real deal. Incorporating compliance into the protocol layer is much more reliable than those projects just shouting slogans. Honestly, there aren't many projects capable of building infrastructure; most are just hyping performance data. This steady and pragmatic style is really rare in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-08 15:55

Finally, someone is talking about transparency. The early set of beliefs is really outdated. Finance needs a bit of mystery; otherwise, how can you harvest the wool, haha. Zero-knowledge proofs sound like magic tricks; can they really be used? I need to ponder the Dusk approach; it feels like there's something there. Writing compliance into code? Sounds pretty sci-fi; can it work in reality? Do you really think finance will embrace blockchain? I'm still a bit skeptical. Basically, it's wanting the cake and eating it too. Can it work this time? Practicality > performance. At least one project has figured things out. But the problem is, will regulatory authorities recognize compliance within the code...

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-08 15:43

Finally, someone is talking about transparency. The early ideals really couldn't withstand the realities of finance.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 01-08 15:40

Oh no, the set of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed clever, feeling like wanting both the cake and to eat it too --- Incorporating compliance logic into the protocol? Sounds like someone is finally taking finance seriously --- Basically, it’s about needing transparency and privacy at the same time. Dusk’s approach is definitely more reliable than just shouting slogans --- I’m a bit impressed by the positioning of financial-grade infrastructure. Not chasing TPS with the trend, but thinking about how to survive long-term --- The previous belief in complete transparency should really be shattered; reality is just so contradictory --- Code is law, and embedding compliance logic into the protocol layer—that’s true innovation, isn’t it? --- But is zero-knowledge proof really that smooth to implement? Or is it still in the ideal stage? --- Coordinating risk controllability and trust requirements together—this task is not as simple as it seems --- It feels like blockchain is finally moving from idealism to realism, a bit emotional

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 01-08 15:37

Haha, finally someone has explained this contradiction clearly. The idea of complete transparency was a utopia in the early days of DeFi. Zero-knowledge proofs have found a balance—able to verify without revealing details. This is the kind of approach that should be expected at a financial level. Dusk's method of integrating compliance into the protocol is indeed innovative. Compared to projects that constantly hype risk management, it's much more reliable. Finally seeing someone stop chasing performance and focus on building solid infrastructure—that's the real way forward.

View OriginalReply0