2026-01-08 15:35:03

The current crypto financial ecosystem faces a sharp dilemma: on-chain transparency means all transaction details are permanently recorded, but institutional investors and traditional finance practitioners precisely need the perfect combination of commercial privacy and compliant auditing. This seemingly irreconcilable contradiction is driving the emergence of a brand new market demand.

On one hand, the core appeal of DeFi comes from on-chain transparency and programmability. On the other hand, enterprise-level applications (bond trading, asset management, supply chain finance) have nearly stringent requirements for data confidentiality and compliance traceability. In the collision of these two forces, a new technological approach is emerging—a complete redesign of blockchain privacy architecture.

Dusk Network’s approach is worth noting. It starts by modifying the consensus layer and proposes the "Isolated Byzantine Agreement" (SBA). It sounds complex, but the core idea is straightforward: during block proposal and validation, cryptographic methods are used to hide validator identities and voting processes. What are the benefits of this? First, it naturally prevents front-end attacks like MEV, and second, it protects participant privacy from the source. This is not a simple PoS improvement but a brand new paradigm tailored for privacy scenarios.

With a secure consensus foundation, upper-layer applications can be developed. Based on this, Dusk has introduced the "Confidential Smart Contract" (XSC) standard. To understand how significant this innovation is, compare it with Ethereum: all smart contract states and transaction inputs on Ethereum are public, accessible to anyone. In contrast, XSC allows contract data and transaction details to remain encrypted. What does this mean? Under the premise of maintaining verifiability, enterprises can conduct confidential transactions on-chain while meeting regulatory audit requirements.

In simple terms, Dusk is attempting to build a new financial infrastructure that is open yet private, transparent yet compliant. This fusion may very well be the key to breaking through for institutional-grade DeFi.

DUSK11,16%

ETH0,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightTrader

· 12h ago

Is it really impossible to have both transparency and privacy? It seems like Dusk's approach still has some potential. --- Wait, can this isolated Byzantine protocol really prevent MEV? I need to look at the code to believe it. --- Another project claiming to solve privacy compliance, but starting from the consensus layer is quite aggressive. --- Institutional entry requires a feeling of being able to audit while not exposing everything, I get it. --- Confidential contracts sound good, but ultimately on-chain data can't escape the eyes off-chain. --- If Dusk can truly integrate DeFi and CeFi, that would be a breakthrough, but it depends on how long it can survive. --- Privacy + compliance, these seemingly contradictory needs, it feels like new projects are shouting about every month, but only a few survive in the end.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 01-09 18:31

It feels like wanting to eat the cake and not let others see it, the difficulty level is really high. By the way, can Dusk's privacy consensus really prevent MEV? I always feel that the deeper the privacy, the easier it is to find loopholes. Institutions just want to have their cake and eat it too, but the chain is inherently transparent. How can this logic be self-consistent? XSC sounds impressive, but will it really be practical... Watching cautiously. This is probably the ultimate paradox in the crypto world: wanting freedom, privacy, and compliance all at once. How can a triangle be a circle?

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 01-08 16:02

Speaking of which, the long-standing dilemma between privacy and transparency has always troubled me. Dusk's combination of SBA + XSC seems to have some real potential. But to be honest, the key to getting institutions to adopt it still depends on whether the regulatory hurdle can be overcome. Having great technology is useless if legal obstacles block the way.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 01-08 15:54

This combination truly hits the mark—privacy layer + smart contracts directly target institutional pain points. MEV protection is handled at the consensus layer, effectively plugging the loopholes at the root, unlike those after-the-fact solutions. If XSC really gets implemented, CeFi folks should be worried too. Feels like this is the correct way for DeFi to open up; those completely transparent systems before have actually become burdens. The key for institutional entry is indeed here, but whether Dusk can truly deliver depends on the actual execution.

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-08 15:53

Can transparency and privacy really coexist? It feels like just a pie in the sky. Dusk's logic sounds good, but when it comes to real implementation, there will definitely be compromises. I believe in the consensus layer's improvements to prevent MEV, but will enterprises truly trust on-chain privacy? It's the same old story: the stronger the privacy, the more regulators panic. In the end, it will definitely be a compromise solution. Wait until Dusk is actually adopted by major institutions before praising it.

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 01-08 15:51

Privacy + compliance is easier to talk about than to actually implement. Dusk's approach seems interesting, but I don't know if it can really be realized. Will institutions really pay for this? Or is it just another thing that sounds impressive but no one actually uses? Is this just playing both sides, can it really work, my friend? Honestly, those privacy coins before thought the same way, and look where that ended... But working on privacy at the consensus layer is indeed a novel idea. It feels like using technology to compensate for the inherent issues of encryption, but the fundamental problem still lies in regulatory attitudes. XSC sounds fancy, but does it really differ from zero-knowledge proofs in essence, or is it just a rebranded concept? To win over institutions and regulators, Dusk needs some real skills; otherwise, it’s just another project that’s been infused with a lot of money.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-08 15:38

Privacy and transparency are inherently false propositions. Dusk's approach is a good attempt to find a balanced point. Institutions really need this; otherwise, nothing can get started. The XSC standard feels a bit like doing VPN on the chain... not sure how it will work in practice. 防MEV (MEV protection) is definitely worth关注, but the risks of modifying the consensus layer are also significant. Ethereum's transparency is actually its original sin; enterprise-level applications will eventually need to address this. Regulatory and audit requirements are there, so we need a solution that can meet these needs without losing the purpose of the chain. Whether Dusk can truly be implemented depends on ecosystem development; technology is only the first half. If this system is successfully implemented, it could change the entire institutional DeFi competitive landscape.

View OriginalReply0