This phenomenon is quite common in the community—some people criticize certain holders, but they are actually just afraid of the strong and soft on the weak. The notorious KOLs are actually untouchable, and as a result, they target newcomers. This logic is really problematic.
Take ASTER as an example. A holder with a position of $700,000 often airdrops ASTER directly to community members. More importantly, this person has been encouraging everyone to hold. But the attitude of the exchange staff is really bad, I have little respect for them. But to be fair, the holder’s approach is indeed different.
It’s clear when you compare—what about other token holders? Basically, it’s the same old pyramid scheme—drawing big pictures first, then making you spend your own money to buy, and they don’t take real actions like some holders do. Airdrops, encouraging holding—this is true community building. Those who only shout slogans will turn around and cut you off; I’ve seen this kind of scheme too many times.
So instead of mutual internal strife, it’s better to see clearly who is truly thinking about the community and who just wants to make a quick profit. The actions of the holders are right there—what they have done and said, speaking with facts is more convincing than anything else.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirDropMissed
· 01-10 15:39
Hey, it's the same old trick of bullying the weak and fearing the strong. Every day, they yell at small investors but dare not touch the big players.
These holders actually have some substance—airdrops + encouragement to hold, much better than those who only make empty promises.
Look at the actions, brother. Don't be fooled by slogans; it's all just a routine.
Wait, is the exchange staff really that outrageous? Their attitude is terrible.
What about the holders of other coins? Masters of tricks—brag first, then dump. Nothing surprising anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 01-08 16:24
Really, the bad habit of bullying the weak and fearing the strong exists throughout the entire community.
Airdrops and continuous support are what show sincerity; I'm already tired of the other tactics of cutting leeks.
This guy ASTER definitely plays differently, his action power is right here.
Some people love to pick fights with newcomers, but they get scared when facing big KOLs. It cracks me up.
Let's see who truly cares about the community; speaking with facts is the best proof.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 01-08 16:23
Action speaks louder than words; airdrops are truly more effective than just shouting slogans.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 01-08 16:21
Bullying the weak and fearing the strong is really disgusting; every day criticizing small investors while not daring to touch a single big shot.
---
ASTER's guy definitely has some skills; the airdrop also encourages holding. Compared to other project teams, it's simply outstanding.
---
Action is the real key; no matter how much nonsense you talk, taking real action is better.
---
It's outrageous—criticizing people on one hand while watching KOLs harvest the leeks without any reaction. What are they thinking?
---
This logic... is a typical case of bullying honest people. Truly speechless.
---
I've seen too many pyramid schemes; it's indeed rare to see someone willing to spend money on an airdrop.
---
Instead of fighting each other, it's better to find projects with genuine sincerity. It's a very simple principle.
---
That exchange is indeed outrageous, but I have to give credit to the holder for this operation.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 01-08 16:17
Really, there are too many instances of bullying the weak and fearing the strong, always looking for soft targets to squeeze.
Airdrop loyal fans are indeed rare, most of them are just routines to cut leeks.
Why don't they dare to criticize big KOLs? They're just cowardly.
The approach of ASTER holders is indeed solid, unlike some project teams that only talk but don't act.
Let's see who is really putting in real money and effort, don't listen to their hype.
This contrast is truly amazing—some are willing to airdrop, while others only make empty promises. The difference is enormous.
Instead of tearing each other down, it's wiser to associate with those who take real action.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-08 16:12
Being afraid of the weak and fearing the strong is really a flaw. They only dare to criticize small retail investors, while the big players back down.
This phenomenon is quite common in the community—some people criticize certain holders, but they are actually just afraid of the strong and soft on the weak. The notorious KOLs are actually untouchable, and as a result, they target newcomers. This logic is really problematic.
Take ASTER as an example. A holder with a position of $700,000 often airdrops ASTER directly to community members. More importantly, this person has been encouraging everyone to hold. But the attitude of the exchange staff is really bad, I have little respect for them. But to be fair, the holder’s approach is indeed different.
It’s clear when you compare—what about other token holders? Basically, it’s the same old pyramid scheme—drawing big pictures first, then making you spend your own money to buy, and they don’t take real actions like some holders do. Airdrops, encouraging holding—this is true community building. Those who only shout slogans will turn around and cut you off; I’ve seen this kind of scheme too many times.
So instead of mutual internal strife, it’s better to see clearly who is truly thinking about the community and who just wants to make a quick profit. The actions of the holders are right there—what they have done and said, speaking with facts is more convincing than anything else.