Recently took a deep dive into the StandX derivatives protocol, and the product logic is quite clear. From the perspective of architecture design and operational rhythm, this is not simply copying others' methods. The core advantages are focused on two areas: one is trading execution efficiency, and the other is the user risk management mechanism. The way these two are combined is somewhat innovative. Compared to common derivative solutions on the market, it indeed offers deeper optimization in trading experience and fund security. This kind of detailed differentiation could become a key competitive advantage for the project in a fierce market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractWorker
· 01-10 23:27
It looks interesting, but the term "differentiation" is overused now. Whether it can really succeed depends on future data.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 01-09 16:38
Sure, finally someone has explained StandX clearly. I had never understood the difference between it, dYdX, and GMX before. It seems that they really pay attention to the details.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-08 16:54
Another derivatives protocol... I've been through this before. How many projects with such "differentiated positioning" have I seen in 2018? In the end? No matter how beautifully the security mechanism is written, the contract still has vulnerabilities. Even if the execution efficiency is fast, it can't match the speed of a scam.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-08 16:45
To be honest, no matter how well these projects are presented, it still depends on whether the actual trading volume can pick up.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMiner
· 01-08 16:34
I'm also researching StandX, but I feel the differentiation isn't strong enough yet. I'll wait and see if the execution efficiency can really be delivered before making any conclusions.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 01-08 16:31
Sounds good, but whether it can really take off depends on execution. There are many protocols with ideas.
Recently took a deep dive into the StandX derivatives protocol, and the product logic is quite clear. From the perspective of architecture design and operational rhythm, this is not simply copying others' methods. The core advantages are focused on two areas: one is trading execution efficiency, and the other is the user risk management mechanism. The way these two are combined is somewhat innovative. Compared to common derivative solutions on the market, it indeed offers deeper optimization in trading experience and fund security. This kind of detailed differentiation could become a key competitive advantage for the project in a fierce market.