M-Pesa built a massive payment empire without touching blockchain—that's the thing. Sixty million monthly users, $314 billion processed annually, twelve billion transactions flowing across Africa every year. Impressive numbers by any standard.
But here's the reality: cross-border movements remain a nightmare. Steep fees eat into margins. Settlement takes forever. Regulatory hoops make everything slower. These friction points have been baked into traditional finance for decades.
That's precisely where the technology conversation shifts. When you've got existing infrastructure handling scale but struggling with speed and cost on international routes, you're staring at an opportunity for rethinking the plumbing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatcher
· 16h ago
m-pesa can really make calls, but the cross-border system is still the same old story. Isn't it just waiting to be resolved?
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAll
· 01-09 23:34
M-Pesa digital is useless even if it's powerful, cross-border transactions still result in a pile of bad debts
---
Traditional finance is just like this; the numbers look good but the experience is terrible
---
Wait, 6 billion transactions are still stuck in cross-border processing? What does this indicate?
---
Good-looking numbers don't mean the system is user-friendly; the core issue is still being held back by outdated methods
---
Having scale without efficiency—that's the true nature of traditional payments
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-08 16:55
From a technical perspective, M-Pesa's approach indeed bypassed blockchain but achieved scale. However, the pain points in cross-border transactions are evident—research shows that the delay costs in traditional payment clearing can consume 3-8% of the total transaction amount. This is why there is huge potential for infrastructure optimization.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-08 16:43
The traditional financial system really needs to be revamped. The fees are ridiculously high and it's painfully slow.
Cross-border transfers are just a joke. No matter how big M-Pesa is, it can't solve this pain point.
Numbers don't lie, but the architecture design is truly a bottleneck.
Isn't it time for blockchain to step in now?
Traditional infrastructure is like this—big but not strong. International payments are still the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 01-08 16:30
M-Pesa looks great, but cross-border transactions are really a bottleneck.
To put it simply, no matter how strong the infrastructure is, it can't save the old traditional finance system. It's time to change the pipes.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctor
· 01-08 16:29
Are you saying M-Pesa doesn't need to go on the chain? Then who will save the cross-border sector?
M-Pesa built a massive payment empire without touching blockchain—that's the thing. Sixty million monthly users, $314 billion processed annually, twelve billion transactions flowing across Africa every year. Impressive numbers by any standard.
But here's the reality: cross-border movements remain a nightmare. Steep fees eat into margins. Settlement takes forever. Regulatory hoops make everything slower. These friction points have been baked into traditional finance for decades.
That's precisely where the technology conversation shifts. When you've got existing infrastructure handling scale but struggling with speed and cost on international routes, you're staring at an opportunity for rethinking the plumbing.