The Federal Reserve's signal of a rate cut in 2026 just sparked ripples in the market, only to be followed by a "persona collapse."
Federal Reserve Board member Milan first provided a clear figure—about 150 basis points of rate cut room, which should have been a reassuring sign for global investors. But then he immediately said, "I have no idea about my future at the Federal Reserve," directly absolving himself of responsibility for his statement.
This move is truly surreal. One sentence still affects global capital markets, and the next immediately negates it. Is the 150 basis points a collective consensus of the Federal Reserve, or just a casual remark by an individual? No one can say for sure.
The key point is that any statement from Federal Reserve officials is significant. One comment can influence the dollar's trend, and a single remark can change capital flows. Milan's "stir up the market first, then clarify" approach has once again muddied the already vague outlook for monetary policy. The market has been waiting for a clear signal, but now it’s even more uncertain due to these inconsistent statements.
What’s behind this? Is it genuine policy indecision, or a signal of some power struggle? No one can be certain now. The market can only navigate through this fog, and such uncertainty is often more unsettling than bad news with a clear message.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleShadow
· 6h ago
A typical smoke screen tactic, the Federal Reserve's influence is becoming more and more pronounced.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 01-09 19:40
If I had known earlier that Federal Reserve officials talk faster than they think, I should have fully shorted my money... These 150 basis points are announced and then denied immediately after, truly playing us.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 01-08 16:55
Milan's move this time is really brilliant. First, they throw a 150 basis point smoke screen, then they don't know when they'll be kicked out. It's a typical "I said it doesn't count" mode.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-08 16:38
This guy is really something—one sentence to harvest the profits, another to shift the blame. The Federal Reserve is playing a game of "Schrödinger's rate cut."
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-08 16:35
The 150 basis points talk, global capital instantly gets excited, then turns around and says "I don't know anything"? Isn't this just playing around...
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-08 16:33
It's the same trick again. After mentioning 150 basis points, they turn around and shift the blame. Truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-08 16:33
Milan's move really made me laugh. First, they drop a 150 basis point bomb, then turn around and say it's uncertain. Who can handle this?
The Federal Reserve's signal of a rate cut in 2026 just sparked ripples in the market, only to be followed by a "persona collapse."
Federal Reserve Board member Milan first provided a clear figure—about 150 basis points of rate cut room, which should have been a reassuring sign for global investors. But then he immediately said, "I have no idea about my future at the Federal Reserve," directly absolving himself of responsibility for his statement.
This move is truly surreal. One sentence still affects global capital markets, and the next immediately negates it. Is the 150 basis points a collective consensus of the Federal Reserve, or just a casual remark by an individual? No one can say for sure.
The key point is that any statement from Federal Reserve officials is significant. One comment can influence the dollar's trend, and a single remark can change capital flows. Milan's "stir up the market first, then clarify" approach has once again muddied the already vague outlook for monetary policy. The market has been waiting for a clear signal, but now it’s even more uncertain due to these inconsistent statements.
What’s behind this? Is it genuine policy indecision, or a signal of some power struggle? No one can be certain now. The market can only navigate through this fog, and such uncertainty is often more unsettling than bad news with a clear message.