Many people are unaware of a detail that causes both themselves and their friends to fall into traps — the issue of rebate binding.



Let's start with the current situation: a single ID card can usually only be bound once for rebate at a major exchange. Sounds fine? That's where the problem lies.

Some might think of cheating by unbinding and then binding a new account. But what happens? Neither party benefits —

After your friend cancels or unbinds, even if they re-register with the same ID, the system will recognize the identity as invalid. You still won't receive the commission, and they won't get the rebate. A wasted effort and a permanent loss of fee income. In plain terms, it's a double loss.

So, what is the correct approach?

First, only use IDs that have never been registered before. That's the foundation. Second, don't blindly pull in users; focus on attracting genuine new users. New users have the highest value and are more cost-effective. Most importantly, clearly communicate this rule so the other party understands. Only then can you build a professional trust relationship and establish long-term cooperation.

Honestly, information asymmetry exists, but don't exploit others' ignorance for a small short-term gain. Ruining someone else's long-term eligibility for a quick profit is harmful to both sides. Set clear rules before taking action — that’s responsible for both parties. That’s the smart way to do it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 01-10 06:28
Damn, I've stepped into this trap before, truly a painful lesson. This rule should have been widely known long ago; how many people are still messing around? A friend used the same ID twice, and I lost both of them... You're right, greed for small gains ultimately leads to nothing. Long-term stability is the way to go, brother.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 01-09 06:00
Wow, I stepped into this trap last year, and I really lost a lot... --- That's right, many people don't even realize this issue. I've seen several friends have disagreements because of it. --- So, harvesting profits should be done ethically, or it just becomes mutual harm. --- This rule needs to be clearly explained to people, or it will really be a double loss. --- Now I only invite genuine newcomers, it's much simpler. --- Information asymmetry is satisfying to use but very unethical; being transparent is better.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-08 16:57
Damn, I stepped into this trap, lost a lot, wasted so many ID resources.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMinervip
· 01-08 16:51
Damn, this rule is really a trap, almost caused my friend to get caught. Honestly, if no one explains these details, you're doomed. There should have been a tutorial long ago. Brothers, make sure to clarify when recruiting people. Don't ruin someone's life just for a small commission. Few people understand this trick, so you need to share it to let more people know. I had a disagreement with a friend over this before, it was truly a double loss. Now I understand, I'd rather earn less than fall into such a trap.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 01-08 16:51
Damn, this trap is really huge. My friend got caught in it like this... a permanent loss, brother.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 01-08 16:48
Wow, really? This pit is so deep... My friend was scammed like this before, and now the account is permanently disabled.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)