Many people have this feeling, but you need to understand—this is not an illusion, nor is it the dealer specifically "watching" your stop-loss.
In simple terms, the real situation is: retail traders' stop-loss levels are highly similar, and large funds are just harvesting liquidity there. You get swept not because your trading is weak, but because you are standing in the most vulnerable positions to be swept.
From a capital structure perspective, what are retail stop-loss orders essentially? They are passive market orders. And passive market orders equal liquidity. What large funds lack most is liquidity—they want to buy when they want to buy, sell when they want to sell, which is unrealistic. They need a large number of counterpart orders, and these transactions must be concentrated, certain, and predictable. Retail traders' stop-loss orders fully meet these three conditions.
Looking further into why retail stop-losses are so consistent: everyone is using previous lows/highs or targeting round numbers (like 90,000, 3,000, 1.0), as well as obvious support and resistance levels, the lowest points of candlesticks, or mechanical ATR stops. These levels seem "professional," but in fact, they have long become market consensus. Where there is consensus, it is the easiest place to be harvested.
This is the core issue—your stop-loss levels are not a secret; they are "common rules" openly displayed. When enough people set stops at the same levels using the same logic, for large funds, this is not "hunting," but "waiting for the wind."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationTherapist
· 01-11 16:07
Haha, really. The strategy of front low and front high with integers has been overused for a long time, no wonder it gets wiped out every time.
Retail investors are just too "standardized," which makes them easy prey.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-09 05:02
That's incredible. Retail traders' stop-loss orders are just knives handed to big funds, and they still think they're professional.
---
Previous lows and highs at integer levels? These levels have long been open slaughterhouses, and there's no way to avoid them.
---
Basically, it's systemic risk. Once triggered, the liquidation price starts a domino effect.
---
So, your risk control threshold is actually the same as others, and it's not a secret weapon at all.
---
No wonder you're always swept at the same levels. It's not the market makers watching you, but your logic is written all over your face.
---
Liquidity is just the counterparty, and retail traders' stop-loss orders are synonymous with passive market orders. They deserve to be harvested.
---
This is the real systemic risk. When enough people use the same ATR stop-loss, for big funds, it's just waiting for the wind to come.
---
The theory of integer levels, previous highs and lows looks professional, but in reality, it's been everywhere for a long time, and no one can escape it.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-08 16:58
Wow, that's why I always get swept... Turns out everyone places their stop-losses in the same spot, no wonder the market makers are so accurate.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 01-08 16:43
I knew it, it's not the big players watching us at all. It's just that we're all standing together, practically providing liquidity to others.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 01-08 16:42
Really, the old routine of front low and front high has long been played out. Big funds are just waiting for us to walk right into the gunfire.
Many people have this feeling, but you need to understand—this is not an illusion, nor is it the dealer specifically "watching" your stop-loss.
In simple terms, the real situation is: retail traders' stop-loss levels are highly similar, and large funds are just harvesting liquidity there. You get swept not because your trading is weak, but because you are standing in the most vulnerable positions to be swept.
From a capital structure perspective, what are retail stop-loss orders essentially? They are passive market orders. And passive market orders equal liquidity. What large funds lack most is liquidity—they want to buy when they want to buy, sell when they want to sell, which is unrealistic. They need a large number of counterpart orders, and these transactions must be concentrated, certain, and predictable. Retail traders' stop-loss orders fully meet these three conditions.
Looking further into why retail stop-losses are so consistent: everyone is using previous lows/highs or targeting round numbers (like 90,000, 3,000, 1.0), as well as obvious support and resistance levels, the lowest points of candlesticks, or mechanical ATR stops. These levels seem "professional," but in fact, they have long become market consensus. Where there is consensus, it is the easiest place to be harvested.
This is the core issue—your stop-loss levels are not a secret; they are "common rules" openly displayed. When enough people set stops at the same levels using the same logic, for large funds, this is not "hunting," but "waiting for the wind."