2026-01-08 16:32:40

Florida is making another serious attempt to establish a state bitcoin reserve. Lawmakers there have introduced fresh legislation targeting 2026, continuing the state's push to position itself at the forefront of crypto-friendly governance. The move reflects growing institutional appetite for BTC as a strategic asset reserve, though broader adoption across US states remains uncertain.

BTC-0,02%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropCollector

· 1h ago

Florida has made a brilliant move, accumulating BTC before 2026, definitely leading other states. Other states are bickering, but Florida has already started planning... Smart. Wait, could it just be loud noise with little substance again? What does the institutional optimism towards Bitcoin indicate? Florida truly considers Bitcoin a strategic asset, going all in. Other states are still hesitating, but this guy is already taking action. By 2026... the price will have to skyrocket. Strategic reserves, sounds like they’re about to bottom fish. Be cautious when Florida is under attack; releasing this news might not be so easily fooled. Now, are you waiting to get on board until Florida completes its accumulation?

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainBreather

· 5h ago

Florida is really serious about this, aiming to implement Bitcoin reserves before 2026... If it succeeds, other states will probably follow suit.

View OriginalReply0

QuietlyStaking

· 01-08 17:02

Florida's move is quite something; is the state-level Bitcoin reserve really coming? --- 2026... Why wait that long? Isn't it better to go all in directly? --- Huh? Now can other states stay put? They're getting competitive. --- The institutional bottom-fishing phase has officially begun. Interesting. --- Waiting to see if other states follow suit—one leads, and the others all follow. --- Here we go again, American politicians are the best at making empty promises. --- Not sure? Then there's a chance. I remain optimistic.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 01-08 17:02

2026? Florida's action is still a bit slow; other states need to catch up.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-08 17:02

Florida's move is truly brilliant. Getting Bitcoin reserves settled before 2026, while other states are still hesitating --- Once again, Florida... This guy really considers himself a crypto hub. Signal for institutional bottom fishing? --- 2026? That's too conservative. Bitcoin could double or triple by then. --- In the US, only Florida is playing this game; what about the others? Wake up! --- No wonder it's a crypto-friendly state. This time, they will have the first mover advantage. --- Strategic reserves are starting to hold Bitcoin. What does that mean? Big moves in the market. --- Only Florida dares to do this. Other states are still hesitating. Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 01-08 17:00

This move in Florida is quite something, with a target for 2026... just not sure how high BTC will go by then.

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 01-08 16:43

Florida's recent moves are actually quite impressive. By 2026, they aim to solidify their position as the most crypto-friendly state in the US. --- Is this the same old story? State-level Bitcoin reserves, sounds good, but it's mostly political show, right? --- Wait, only happening in 2026? Fine, let's see how other states respond first. --- Wow, this idea is brilliant—treat BTC as national treasury assets. Institutions are really waking up. --- Florida is all in on this, but it might not succeed. Don't get your hopes too high. --- It's just about grabbing the spotlight. Whatever happens when it lands will be a different story. --- Has the era of Bitcoin strategic reserves truly arrived? It feels like the trend might be shifting back to traditional finance. --- I'm just worried there are too many variables, policies can still change. Let's wait until everything is finalized.

View OriginalReply0