Recently, I've been looking into the meme coin sector, and honestly, I feel a bit emotional. The once legendary popularity of Fartcoin is now really hard to replicate. The overall market conditions are not as hot, and it's very difficult for new projects to stand out.
However, recently I came across the SYNBO project, and I find it quite interesting. It's not the usual fundraising approach; the decision-making process within the community is quite different—it's not just the project team pushing out information unilaterally, but truly discussing and making decisions together. This kind of atmosphere is actually quite rare in today's Web3 projects.
No one will give you the answer directly; instead, they lay out the process and thought process, and community members participate in it. This level of transparency and engagement, compared to the traditional project operation models nowadays, indeed feels a bit different. Maybe that's why some projects can still stay vibrant during downturns—they genuinely value the community.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
11
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmi
· 01-10 22:07
Really, meme coins have been out of fashion for a long time. Now trying to recreate the hype of Fartcoin? Haha.
SYNBO's approach is indeed rare, but community decision-making sounds easy; sticking to it is the real challenge.
Forgot how Fartcoin died? Here we go again.
Really transparent? Or just another form of packaging? Let's wait and see.
I've seen many projects that the community cares about, but few of them survive in the end.
This format suits the current taste, but I'm just worried that the hype will fade once it cools down.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-10 06:24
Is the community truly involved or just a gimmick? It depends on whether they can deliver later. Simply revealing the process isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetector
· 01-09 18:01
Is community truly making decisions or just using套路话术? Voting with your feet is the clearest answer.
---
That wave of Fartcoin was indeed incredible. Now it's extremely difficult to replicate.
---
It seems that ultimately, these projects depend on whether they can truly distribute dividends. The air of hype is the most deadly.
---
High transparency can be judged by whether token holders are making money.
---
Projects maintained solely by the community are actually riskier. Once sentiment reverses, it's game over.
---
But to be fair, compared to those purely for quick profits, at least their attitude is correct.
---
Has decision-making power really been handed over to the community, or is the project team just beautifying the wording?
---
It's true that during downturns, people still play—that's the real key, no doubt.
---
The essence of meme coins depends on luck and timing; no matter how good the structure is, it can't change that.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ef943842
· 01-09 06:20
Hold on tight, we're about to take off 🛫
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 01-08 17:03
wait hold up, "community-driven decision making"? ⚠️ CRITICAL: that's literally how exit scams disguise themselves. seen this pattern 47 times already this cycle. they get you *invested* in the "process" while smart contract vulnerabilities go unaudited. DYOR on their github commits fr fr, audit report or bust. not financial advice but... red flags everywhere here ngl
Reply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 01-08 16:58
Does the community really participate in decision-making? It's nice to see projects like this these days, much better than those that just make empty promises every day.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 01-08 16:46
Community decision-making sounds nice in theory, but how many can actually implement it? I just want to see how SYNBO plays out later, and not become another excuse for cutting the leeks.
---
That wave of Fartcoin was truly incredible; current meme coins have lost that flavor... However, the community co-decision approach is quite fresh, just worried that it sounds good but is actually superficial.
---
High transparency? Let's wait and see. The louder the hype now, the harder the fall later.
---
I've heard too many times that the community is taken seriously... Can SYNBO be different this time? Stay tuned, everyone.
---
What really piques my curiosity is whether this model can truly work in the end, or if it will still be the project team calling the shots.
---
I'm a bit tempted to check out the community, but I'll observe for a while before taking action. It seems that meme coins really need new gameplay now.
---
Compared to projects that raise funds right from the start, this co-decision model is quite interesting. Just see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 01-08 16:45
Community governance sounds good, but can it really help the project last longer? Or is it just another new way to cut the leeks?
The SYNBO model is indeed rare, but I'm more concerned about how its token economic model is designed.
Meme coins have been played out for a long time, and you still want to recreate the hype of Fartcoin? No way.
Nowadays, projects that dare to openly share their decision-making process are indeed rare, but the question is... do ordinary community members truly participate?
During downturns, you can actually see who genuinely cares about the community and who is just paying lip service.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-08 16:44
Is the community truly making decisions or just following a script? We'll see then.
It seems that SYNBO's transparency gimmick is quite a bit, but how many can really execute it properly?
Meme coins are all about luck; no one can replicate the Fartcoin wave.
Talking about taking the community seriously, you'll see when conflicts of interest arise.
But this kind of participation feeling is indeed more comfortable than pure investors; at least the deception isn't so blatant.
If it can stay active during a downturn, it means there's either real value or they are hiding their exit more cleverly.
Who still dares to go all in this round?
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 01-08 16:41
Honestly, projects with real community voting power are indeed scarce, most are just superficial governance.
SYNBO's transparent decision-making sounds good, but I'm just worried it will turn into another mask for rug pulls.
That wave of Fartcoin really can't go back, but that doesn't mean there's no chance; it all depends on who truly cares about the community.
There are too many follow-the-trend projects; truly genuine ones are rare.
I just want to see how SYNBO will develop in the future; as long as it doesn't turn into air, it's fine.
Projects with high community engagement tend to last longer, and that's a fact.
By the way, are people still playing in the Meme coin space? It feels like the hype isn't what it used to be.
Transparency is easy to talk about but hard to implement; most projects say one thing and do another.
I just want to know if SYNBO's community decisions can actually be implemented in the end.
During downturns, it's actually a test of character; truly reliable projects will naturally survive.
Community governance is full of gimmicks; actions speak louder than words.
The Meme coin scene feels a bit sluggish now; it's hard for new projects to create waves.
Recently, I've been looking into the meme coin sector, and honestly, I feel a bit emotional. The once legendary popularity of Fartcoin is now really hard to replicate. The overall market conditions are not as hot, and it's very difficult for new projects to stand out.
However, recently I came across the SYNBO project, and I find it quite interesting. It's not the usual fundraising approach; the decision-making process within the community is quite different—it's not just the project team pushing out information unilaterally, but truly discussing and making decisions together. This kind of atmosphere is actually quite rare in today's Web3 projects.
No one will give you the answer directly; instead, they lay out the process and thought process, and community members participate in it. This level of transparency and engagement, compared to the traditional project operation models nowadays, indeed feels a bit different. Maybe that's why some projects can still stay vibrant during downturns—they genuinely value the community.