2026-01-08 16:33:47

Have you noticed that some projects with only a 10k market cap can be completely drained within 5 seconds? The reasons behind this are much more insidious than you might think.

It appears that the 50 distributed holding wallets are actually controlled by only 10 true independent operators. It's like magic tricks — on the surface, it looks like many retail investors are involved, but in reality, all are linked to quintuple accounts. This creates a false illusion of market depth.

When most holdings are concentrated in a few wallets, controlling the market becomes very easy. One person managing five accounts can easily simulate market enthusiasm, create a fake trading volume, and then dump all at once. By the time retail investors react, the funds have already fled.

That's why you need to pay more attention to the actual holding structure of a project. Don't just look at the number of holders on the surface; dig deeper into the distribution of independent addresses. This is a key piece of information to determine whether a project truly has a market foundation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 19h ago

It's the same old trick, the same script every time. That's why I never look at the number of holders; checking on-chain data is the real key. Operations like five-tuple accounts are too low-level; they can be spotted at a glance. Retail investors are always the last to know; the money is gone long ago.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-08 18:40

Damn, it's the same old trick again, a cast of 50 wallet actors.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 01-08 17:03

It's the same old trick, I'm already tired of it. That's why I never believe the number of holders. The quintuple wallet strategy is really awesome, retail investors are still looking at K-line charts. Wow, looking at this, my previous projects might have been liquidated in the same way. Deeply analyzing address distribution sounds good, but does anyone really take the initiative to do homework? The rapid clearing speed is suspicious, and this logic is correct.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMom

· 01-08 17:03

It's the same old trick, and every time it's the newbies who get caught. That's why I absolutely refuse to touch low market cap projects; they're too shady. Fiveling accounts? It's like one person has five lives, hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 01-08 16:58

This trick is too familiar; I've been burned once before. But on the other hand, how do you distinguish between real and fake addresses? Are there any tools? The five-tuple account trick is indeed ruthless; retail investors are always the last to take the fall. It's more important to look at the holdings distribution than the price trend, right? That's why I only stick to major market coins now; small projects are all scams.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 01-08 16:58

It's the same scam again, the Quintuplet Wallet has been played out.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 01-08 16:43

After playing for so long, I still can't escape this routine, it's really incredible. The fivefold account trick is really everywhere, I get caught every time. Deep illusion, retail investors are always the last to take the fall. That's why I now check the address distribution of projects first, or else I lose everything. It's the same group of people harvesting the little guys, coming back with a different skin. 10k market cap and still dare to play? You guys are really brave. Next time I see this kind of dispersed holding I will just block it, too damn routine. The holding structure clearly shows it's a pump-and-dump coin, not interesting.

View OriginalReply0