When mentioning privacy coins or anonymous transactions, many people reflexively think of "money laundering."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-11 16:31
Is privacy protection equivalent to money laundering? Isn't this logic backwards? Should bank accounts also be banned?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-11 01:35
Bro, this stereotype is really ridiculous... Privacy is just privacy, why do you have to think of the worst case?
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-08 17:02
Actually, it's just a stereotype. Privacy ≠ illegal. Don't you all use passwords anymore?
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-08 16:59
Really? These people are so stubborn—privacy = money laundering? Then TLS encryption should also be dead, huh?
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 01-08 16:37
Isn't this just labeling thinking? Privacy itself isn't wrong.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 01-08 16:36
This is completely a stereotype, accusing of money laundering at every turn, really treating technology as a tool for crime.
When mentioning privacy coins or anonymous transactions, many people reflexively think of "money laundering."