The Federal Reserve needs to be more aggressive with rate cuts. Getting below the 3% mark as soon as possible could be a game-changer for market sentiment and capital flows. When rates stay elevated, it keeps money locked up in low-risk instruments and drains liquidity from risk assets. A faster cutting cycle would shift that dynamic—freeing up capital that could flow into alternative investments and supporting broader market recovery. The question isn't whether cuts are coming, but whether the Fed will act with sufficient urgency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 01-11 00:12
What exactly is the Federal Reserve dithering about? They should have cut interest rates long ago. Staying stuck above 3% like this really makes people uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 01-10 18:41
If Powell doesn't cut interest rates again, I'll angrily smash the Federal Reserve door
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 01-10 18:00
If the Federal Reserve doesn't cut interest rates soon, I'm going to sell my house. Below 3% is the signal to build positions. Sticking to stablecoins now is really costing me dearly.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 01-08 17:38
Wait, will the Federal Reserve really buy into this rhetoric... It just feels like a gamble.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 01-08 17:29
The Federal Reserve needs to step up its game; staying below 3% can really change the situation.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 01-08 17:26
According to research, this linear liquidity assumption actually has logical flaws. From a technical perspective, the transmission mechanism between interest rates and risk asset allocation is not a linear relationship—during the rate hike cycle in 2022, a large amount of data showed that even low interest rates do not necessarily drive capital into high-risk assets; the key is the change in risk appetite. It is worth noting that the Fed's decision-making pace often lags behind market expectations, so the argument of "urgency" itself is somewhat idealized.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 01-08 17:26
The Federal Reserve keeps dithering and dragging its feet. The 3% threshold should have been broken long ago. What are they waiting for now?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 01-08 17:24
Fed really needs to take action this time, or all the money will be dead in government bonds. That's the key.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-08 17:18
The Federal Reserve really needs to step up its efforts. If they keep dragging on, funds will be stuck in bonds to the point of suffocation.
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTom
· 01-08 17:13
The Federal Reserve needs to step up its efforts; only below 3% can the market truly be revitalized... Otherwise, funds will all be stuck in government bonds, how can alt investments thrive?
The Federal Reserve needs to be more aggressive with rate cuts. Getting below the 3% mark as soon as possible could be a game-changer for market sentiment and capital flows. When rates stay elevated, it keeps money locked up in low-risk instruments and drains liquidity from risk assets. A faster cutting cycle would shift that dynamic—freeing up capital that could flow into alternative investments and supporting broader market recovery. The question isn't whether cuts are coming, but whether the Fed will act with sufficient urgency.