"I operate with full position, why am I still losing everything?"
After looking at his trading records, I finally understood—an account of 10,000U, used 9,500U to open a 10x long position, and didn't even set a stop-loss. When the market retraced 3%, the account was instantly wiped out.
Many people misunderstand one thing: thinking that full position equals strong risk resistance. In fact, it's a double-edged sword. Used correctly, it can keep you flexible amid volatility; used wrongly, it can lead to quicker ruin.
**Why is full position trading prone to liquidation?**
The issue isn't the leverage itself, but the position size. For example, with a 1,000U account, if you use 900U to open a 10x leverage position, a 5% adverse move can directly liquidate you; but if you use 100U with 10x leverage, you'd need a 50% move to be wiped out. My friend put 95% of his funds into a position—even with 10x leverage, he couldn't withstand even a slight market move.
**How to trade with full position without getting liquidated?**
I stick to three bottom lines, and over half a year, I haven't been liquidated, and my account has doubled.
**First: Limit each trade to within 20% of total funds.** For example, with a 10,000U account, use at most 2,000U per trade. Even if you pick the wrong direction and get stopped out with a 10% loss, that's only 200U—nothing serious.
**Second: Limit single-loss to 3%.** With 2,000U at 10x leverage, pre-calculate your stop-loss point; allowing a maximum of 1.5% move means a loss of 300U, exactly 3% of total funds.
**Third: Don't trade in choppy markets, and don't add to winning positions.** Only enter when the trend is clear; during sideways movement, wait patiently. Even after entering, avoid greedily adding to positions—emotions can ruin your rhythm.
**What is the essence of full position trading?**
Honestly, the original purpose of full position isn't to gamble on the direction, but to leave room for adjustment during market fluctuations. The core idea is light position sizing for trial and error, combined with strict risk control.
A fan used to blow up his account every month, but later switched to 20% position size with 3% stop-loss. In three months, he went from 5,000U to 8,000U. He later reflected: "Full position was originally meant for steady gains, not as a gambling tool to chase bigger profits."
In the end, whether full or incremental positions are just tools. The real way to make money is through scientific position management. Control your position size, and you'll survive longer in this market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RegenRestorer
· 17h ago
Using 95% full position with 10x leverage, this guy is really playing with fire. No wonder he got wiped out in one wave.
Position management sounds simple, but very few people actually do it. Most of the time, greed destroys everything.
Not setting a stop-loss is basically gambling. Winning once makes you think you're a pro, losing means going all the way to zero. There are plenty of traders like this in the market.
A framework of 20% per trade + 3% stop-loss is indeed reliable, but the key is to have discipline; otherwise, it's all pointless.
When the mindset collapses, it's easiest to add to the position, and this is the hardest to control.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 01-08 17:51
95% in and directly finished, this guy really dares to do it, not even setting stop-loss, this is gambling not trading.
To be honest, I verified the 20% position number long ago, it is indeed stable, just the returns are a bit slow, but at least staying alive.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larry
· 01-08 17:49
9500U opens with 10x leverage. This guy really wants to prove he can go all-in in one shot, haha.
Liquidation isn't caused by leverage; it's purely self-inflicted. I've always stuck to the 20% position line, and my sleep quality has improved a lot.
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 01-08 17:44
Another gambler's self-help guide, everything said is correct but no one listens
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 01-08 17:24
95% pressed in without setting a stop-loss? This guy just wants to quickly clear his account.
A 20% single trade + 3% stop-loss strategy is indeed reliable, much better than those who chase 10x returns every day and don't last long.
Full position doesn't mean pressing all in; how many times do I have to say this before some people understand?
Win big once and get rich, lose once and quit the scene. Why not learn how to survive a bit longer?
Sharing these kinds of posts many times won't help; real change comes from bleeding in your account and learning from it.
"I operate with full position, why am I still losing everything?"
After looking at his trading records, I finally understood—an account of 10,000U, used 9,500U to open a 10x long position, and didn't even set a stop-loss. When the market retraced 3%, the account was instantly wiped out.
Many people misunderstand one thing: thinking that full position equals strong risk resistance. In fact, it's a double-edged sword. Used correctly, it can keep you flexible amid volatility; used wrongly, it can lead to quicker ruin.
**Why is full position trading prone to liquidation?**
The issue isn't the leverage itself, but the position size. For example, with a 1,000U account, if you use 900U to open a 10x leverage position, a 5% adverse move can directly liquidate you; but if you use 100U with 10x leverage, you'd need a 50% move to be wiped out. My friend put 95% of his funds into a position—even with 10x leverage, he couldn't withstand even a slight market move.
**How to trade with full position without getting liquidated?**
I stick to three bottom lines, and over half a year, I haven't been liquidated, and my account has doubled.
**First: Limit each trade to within 20% of total funds.** For example, with a 10,000U account, use at most 2,000U per trade. Even if you pick the wrong direction and get stopped out with a 10% loss, that's only 200U—nothing serious.
**Second: Limit single-loss to 3%.** With 2,000U at 10x leverage, pre-calculate your stop-loss point; allowing a maximum of 1.5% move means a loss of 300U, exactly 3% of total funds.
**Third: Don't trade in choppy markets, and don't add to winning positions.** Only enter when the trend is clear; during sideways movement, wait patiently. Even after entering, avoid greedily adding to positions—emotions can ruin your rhythm.
**What is the essence of full position trading?**
Honestly, the original purpose of full position isn't to gamble on the direction, but to leave room for adjustment during market fluctuations. The core idea is light position sizing for trial and error, combined with strict risk control.
A fan used to blow up his account every month, but later switched to 20% position size with 3% stop-loss. In three months, he went from 5,000U to 8,000U. He later reflected: "Full position was originally meant for steady gains, not as a gambling tool to chase bigger profits."
In the end, whether full or incremental positions are just tools. The real way to make money is through scientific position management. Control your position size, and you'll survive longer in this market.