We pay for cloud storage every year—renewing memberships when phone space runs out, buying annual plans for more computer files. When you tally up these costs, it can be quite frustrating. But in the world of Web3, storage is being reinvented. Today, let’s explore whether there’s a way to completely change this pay-as-you-go model.



For example, suppose you want to permanently store 1TB of data—whether it’s old family photos, creative assets, or project documents. There are three options available, each with a completely different bill:

**Option 1: The traditional cloud storage approach**

Rent server space from big tech companies. The monthly fee is roughly $20 to $50 (based on regular cloud membership rates). It doesn’t sound expensive, but the problem is—you have to keep paying forever. If one day the provider changes policies, adjusts privacy rules, or the server fails, you’re left holding the bag. It’s like locking your data in someone else’s hands.

**Option 2: Classic decentralized storage**

Pay once for permanent storage. Sounds great, but the cost is truly daunting. This approach requires every node in the network to store a complete copy of the data, and the replication costs increase linearly. The initial investment barrier is too high for ordinary users to afford.

**Option 3: New storage protocols**

Same one-time payment for permanent storage, but with a different approach. Using innovative coding techniques (like the Red-Stuff scheme), it can achieve highly reliable storage with a lower replication factor (only 4 to 5 backups). The key is—costs can be reduced to a fraction of traditional decentralized solutions.

Doesn’t this seem like the kind of storage cost we should have? No longer endless leasing, but truly owning a permanent asset.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenRugsvip
· 01-09 01:51
Wait, the 1% level? Where did this number come from? Is it really that cheap in actual use? I tried route two, and it indeed went bankrupt... Permanent assets sound great, but who guarantees that this protocol will still be alive five years from now?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 01-08 17:54
Listening to this, I just remembered how much unnecessary money I spent on various cloud storage memberships... Now finally someone has figured out the bill clearly. It's both buyout and one percent of the cost, feels much more reliable than I expected. That's right, it's really frustrating that data is locked in big companies, but whether this new protocol is reliable depends on what actual users say. One percent of the cost? Could it be just another pie-in-the-sky promise... Permanent storage sounds tempting, but I'm worried it's just another "very impressive" project. It feels like someone finally thought of the pain points of ordinary people, otherwise we're just working for cloud storage providers.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhangvip
· 01-08 17:54
Basically, it's just a new concept to cut leeks again. Can the third way really be a hundred times cheaper? Why do I find it so hard to believe?
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroupvip
· 01-08 17:53
Route Three sounds good, but how many projects will actually be implemented? I'm afraid it will just be another PPT coin. Red-Stuff has been hyped for so long, but what is the actual user experience like? Could it be another scam where they run away? Permanent storage sounds great, but what if the project team disappears... Decentralization is also a gamble on the project's integrity. Can a 1TB one-time purchase really be as cheap as 1%? How is this number calculated? Is there third-party verification? Honestly, it still depends on who does it and how they operate. No matter how advanced the technical solution is, without a reliable team, it's all pointless. Currently, Web3 storage is still mostly small projects. Who can truly compete with cloud giants? I haven't seen any. But this idea really hits the pain point. After being exploited by cloud providers for so many years, it's time for someone to shake things up. If data truly becomes permanent, how do we ensure privacy? Isn't it just another way to be spied on?
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMinervip
· 01-08 17:49
Route 3 sounds good, but can it really be stable? I'm worried it's still in the conceptual stage. --- After all this hype, when will it actually be usable? It still depends on real-world implementation. --- Have you calculated the 1% cost? What about the intermediate links? --- Permanent storage sounds great, but what if the protocol fails? Who bears the risk? --- It's both storage and encoding, ordinary people can't understand it. Can it be simplified? --- Sequoia is already expensive, if we cut costs further, it might become more centralized. --- I still don't trust decentralization; it feels too虚 (vague/uncertain). --- Is this worth it? Comparing one-time investment to annual renewal fees, what are the specific numbers?
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHandervip
· 01-08 17:43
This guy is right, it's really annoying to pay this unjustified fee every year. One percent cost? That sounds a bit mysterious, can it really be implemented? Is Route 3 reliable? Could it be just another scam? Permanent assets sound great, but I'm afraid it's just another pie in the sky. Red-Stuff is really that powerful? Has anyone used it for major projects?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt