2026-01-08 17:24:41

MSCI announces a strategic adjustment: while keeping Strategy within its index, the inclusion comes with a hidden NOS clause that restricts new Strategy shares from being added to future index weightings. This means existing positions remain tracked, but growth through new share issuances won't automatically receive index exposure. The move signals a nuanced stance—maintaining market recognition while limiting passive capital inflows through index tracking funds. For investors monitoring institutional adoption and index composition changes in the crypto space, this represents a significant shift in how traditional indices handle digital asset exposure.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

EthMaximalist

· 01-09 03:11

Huh? What the hell is this NOS clause? Since it's included in the index, it's half-hidden and half-exposed. It's like giving a sweet deal but not fully satisfying.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 01-08 22:44

NGL, this move is a bit sneaky—want both reputation and market control? Keep the old shares but block the new issuance... It's the classic "I acknowledge you but don't fully support you" tactic.

View OriginalReply0

MemecoinTrader

· 01-08 17:54

yo this NOS clause is pure gatekeeping theater fr... they're basically saying "we'll keep you on the menu but starving you of passive inflows" lmao. classic institutional playbook—maintain the optics while choking the growth mechanics. smart move ngl, but transparent af if you know what to look for. the real alpha? watch which insiders front-run this narrative before the masses catch on.

Reply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-08 17:53

Yo, this is the usual trick of traditional finance—wanting it all, but not giving anything... Keeping existing positions but adding newly issued tokens won't let you win passively through index funds, it's truly a dead end.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 01-08 17:50

So basically, MSCI gave a half-hearted approval? Past issues are forgiven, but any new ones must be suppressed. This approach is truly brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-08 17:46

Nah, this move is too sneaky, wanting to ride the hype but afraid of passive funds flowing in? MSCI is just playing this game...

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 01-08 17:38

Wait, are they saying MSCI gave Strategy a loophole but secretly tied it up? I know this feeling... The double standards in traditional finance are truly unmatched.

View OriginalReply0

0xSoulless

· 01-08 17:29

Hi, it's a typical smoke and mirrors trick—performing decently on stage and choking when it counts. This is the usual playbook of traditional finance against us.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTalker

· 01-08 17:26

actually, if we examine this through the lens of index game theory... the NOS clause is basically MSCI saying "yeah you're in, but no free lunch for new shares lol." it's that classic institutional gatekeeping move—recognition without the passive capital flood. TL;DR for newcomers: existing holders stay blessed, but future issuances gotta earn it the hard way.

Reply0