2026-01-08 17:24:53

A concerning development in the connectivity space: Starlink's application for an Internet service provider license in South Africa faces rejection, with reports suggesting discriminatory grounds playing a role in the decision. This raises serious questions about the regulatory environment and the criteria being applied to infrastructure providers in the region.

For the broader Web3 and blockchain ecosystem, reliable internet infrastructure is foundational. When licensing decisions appear to be influenced by factors unrelated to technical capability or service quality, it creates uncertainty for businesses seeking to operate in emerging markets.

The incident highlights a deeper issue—how emerging economies approach telecom regulation and whether political or demographic considerations are being weighted against merit-based evaluation. As decentralized finance and blockchain adoption grow in Africa, stable and fair regulatory frameworks become increasingly critical. Such decisions could potentially impact not just satellite internet expansion, but the entire digital economy infrastructure these regions are building.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

probably_nothing_anon

· 01-11 17:21

Starlink was rejected by South Africa? Haha, this regulation is really interesting. To be honest, they just don't want foreign entities to disrupt the market.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-11 14:37

South Africa's recent actions are really unbearable... Refusing Starlink just to protect local ISPs? Does that logic even make sense? Honestly... DeFi has finally gained some momentum in Africa, and now even basic internet infrastructure is being messed with.

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 01-11 04:20

South Africa's move is really brilliant, using regulation as a pretext for protectionism. It's outrageous that Starlink was rejected... Web3 needs to get off the ground, but first it has to pass this hurdle.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-08 17:51

South Africa's recent actions are truly outrageous... Regulatory authorities are using political factors to hinder internet infrastructure, making the future of Web3 in Africa difficult.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 01-08 17:49

South Africa's recent actions are truly outrageous... Just refuse if you want to refuse, and do you have to justify it so pompously? They really think we're fools. The hidden rules in regulation have never changed; they always say "based on favorable evaluations," but in reality, it's all about relationships. The future of Web3 in Africa is probably on hold again; infrastructure bottlenecks are really frustrating. The dream of internet freedom seems to never wake up in emerging markets. That's why decentralization is necessary; centralized institutions can't be trusted. Starlink, no matter how awesome, still has to bow to local power figures. When capital meets authority, the latter always has the final say. South Africa's tactics are being learned elsewhere too. Who will be rejected next... Watching Web3 slowly die over there, it really hurts.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 01-08 17:48

South Africa's recent move is really outrageous. What era are we in still playing these tricks... Is Starlink being rejected because of discrimination? If that's true, the future of Web3 in Africa could be in serious danger.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-08 17:41

South Africa's recent actions are really disappointing. We were promised a valuation based on quality... Now even internet infrastructure has become politicized, how can Web3 expand in Africa?

View OriginalReply0