From the perspective of the public chain ecosystem's perpetual DEX track, $LIT faces an opportunity for a revaluation. Comparing with $ASTER and $HYPE, which have already completed TGE, all three's trading volume, active holdings, and fee flows can be directly verified, with transparent data and no water-padding. Under these circumstances, either LIT's valuation is adjusted upward, or the other two projects face pressure and pull back—there is no third option. It's somewhat like the difference between internet securities companies and traditional brokerages in 2015; new players have lower FDV, but ultimately they will revert to a reasonable industry valuation level, followed by small fluctuations in individual stock fundamentals. The market will eventually provide the answer.

LIT1,21%
ASTER-1,26%
HYPE2,15%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaisyUnicornvip
· 12h ago
The data speaks for itself, choose one of three... Either LIT takes off, or the two buddies get pulled back, someone has to adjust their position anyway. This game of chess is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 01-09 01:29
Haha, this logic is a bit rigid, feels like you're just looking for reasons for LIT.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGasvip
· 01-09 00:25
Wow, this data transparency really hit the mark for me. LIT definitely feels a bit undervalued this time. --- Comparing the data makes it very clear. I really don't know what everyone is still waiting for. --- That analogy from 2015 was brilliant. Now DEX is just reenacting that show. --- Valuations will eventually return to rationality; it all depends on when LIT will wake up. --- Transaction fee flows can't be fooled; the market will react sooner or later. --- I feel like the narrative for LIT still needs to be further developed; the data is right here. --- The three-choice logic is convincing. That's right, it's just that simple and straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblindvip
· 01-08 17:54
Valuation re-pricing sounds pretty harsh... but the data is really there. LIT will either take off or those two will drop in value, no middle ground. The analogy with internet brokerage is indeed spot-on; it was the same intense competition back then. Just don't know when the market will figure this out.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 01-08 17:31
The idea of revaluing the valuation has been heard too many times, but the data is there and can't be argued with... In the end, it still depends on whether LIT can truly generate trading volume; having a low FDV alone is useless.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetectorvip
· 01-08 17:29
LIT this time is indeed interesting; the data is right here, you can't fool anyone. Either take off or go down with it, there's no middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-08 17:27
Wait, is the data really that transparent? Why does the trading depth of LIT seem nowhere near as intense...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 01-08 17:27
This opportunity with LIT is indeed good, the data is there, both ASTER and HYPE have risen, there's no reason for LIT to stay stagnant.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 01-08 17:25
Data transparency is indeed unquestionable, but is there really no third option? History always loves to surprise us.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)