Recently, I took a walk through a bank and looked at those loan interest rate terms, and I couldn't help but shake my head.
In the traditional economy, how difficult is it to get a loan? Filling out forms, checking credit reports, mortgaging property—only then will the bank offer you an interest rate of 4%-6%. If it's a credit loan? They’ll just add 10% on top. Hard work, and still being exploited.
But look at the story on the Web3 side, and it's completely different.
Suppose you hold BNB and want to lend out stablecoins. No forms to fill out, no proof of identity, no credit blemishes—just lock BNB into a smart contract, and in seconds, you can borrow USD1 at an annualized rate of 0.41%. In other words, borrowing $10,000 for a year costs only $41 in interest. This number, in traditional finance, can't even cover a single transfer fee.
This is called a dimensionality reduction attack.
Why is it so cheap? Because the underlying logic is completely different. Traditional banks need to absorb deposits and then pay deposit interest, making money from the interest spread. But stablecoin protocols based on collateralization don't need the role of "depositors" at all, so there's no burden of deposit interest, and borrowing costs are automatically pushed to the floor. Code replaces manual labor, and efficiency skyrockets.
Now, with BNB fluctuating around $880, I hear that many real-world business owners are collateralizing their BNB to borrow stablecoins, converting them into cash to pay wages and purchase supplies. Why? Because the capital cost here is almost zero, and it's ridiculously cheaper than traditional financing.
This is not just a lending tool; it's an evolution of capital efficiency. Those still only watching the price fluctuations of coins probably haven't understood what Web3 is truly changing. The real value lies in this revolution in funding costs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETHReserveBank
· 01-11 15:40
0.41%? This is true financial innovation, traditional banks simply can't compete.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 01-11 11:50
0.41% this interest rate is outrageous, the bank will go bankrupt directly
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 01-09 08:36
0.41% annualized? No way, is this thing real? The banks would be crying if they heard this, haha
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetective
· 01-08 17:58
0.41% this interest rate is really amazing, traditional banks would be crying when they see it
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 01-08 17:57
0.41% this number is truly amazing; traditional banks would probably be crying if they heard it.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 01-08 17:53
Wow, 0.41%. Banks would be crying their eyes out after hearing this.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-08 17:53
ngl that 0.41% rate sounds insane until your health factor tanks and suddenly you're liquidation bait... been there, lost that. these business owners better be watching their collateral ratios like hawks or 2022 is gonna repeat itself, just saying.
Reply0
Anon4461
· 01-08 17:42
Wow, a 0.41% interest rate—traditional finance is really getting crushed.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-08 17:42
0.41%? Bro, this isn't borrowing money, this is farming for wool!
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 01-08 17:34
Wow, a 0.41% interest rate is really amazing, even banks would be crying after hearing it.
Recently, I took a walk through a bank and looked at those loan interest rate terms, and I couldn't help but shake my head.
In the traditional economy, how difficult is it to get a loan? Filling out forms, checking credit reports, mortgaging property—only then will the bank offer you an interest rate of 4%-6%. If it's a credit loan? They’ll just add 10% on top. Hard work, and still being exploited.
But look at the story on the Web3 side, and it's completely different.
Suppose you hold BNB and want to lend out stablecoins. No forms to fill out, no proof of identity, no credit blemishes—just lock BNB into a smart contract, and in seconds, you can borrow USD1 at an annualized rate of 0.41%. In other words, borrowing $10,000 for a year costs only $41 in interest. This number, in traditional finance, can't even cover a single transfer fee.
This is called a dimensionality reduction attack.
Why is it so cheap? Because the underlying logic is completely different. Traditional banks need to absorb deposits and then pay deposit interest, making money from the interest spread. But stablecoin protocols based on collateralization don't need the role of "depositors" at all, so there's no burden of deposit interest, and borrowing costs are automatically pushed to the floor. Code replaces manual labor, and efficiency skyrockets.
Now, with BNB fluctuating around $880, I hear that many real-world business owners are collateralizing their BNB to borrow stablecoins, converting them into cash to pay wages and purchase supplies. Why? Because the capital cost here is almost zero, and it's ridiculously cheaper than traditional financing.
This is not just a lending tool; it's an evolution of capital efficiency. Those still only watching the price fluctuations of coins probably haven't understood what Web3 is truly changing. The real value lies in this revolution in funding costs.