2026-01-08 17:35:44

I put together a breakdown on SERA and ran it by the SentientAGI community for feedback. Here's what stood out:

Most AI solutions work through guesswork—they try different tools sequentially, which means you might get different results every time you ask.

SERA's approach is different. It doesn't guess. Instead, it deterministically selects the optimal tools and prompts for each task, delivering consistent results.

That consistency? That's the edge.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractFreelancer

· 01-10 13:09

That deterministic approach has been around for a while; the real question is how stable it can run...

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-10 09:12

ngl this is what true AI should be doing. Just try this set randomly. I'm tired of it.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-09 00:19

Hey, this is what I want to see. Deterministic stuff should have been popularized long ago. Guessing-based AI really needs to be regulated.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPhoenix

· 01-08 18:05

Damn, I need to ponder the logic of SERA... Stability really is the ultimate weapon in AI --- Another product claiming to be able to traverse cycles, but I feel like we still have to watch the market temperament --- Oh wait, about the certainty of output... If it can really be achieved, it would indeed change the game --- Having experienced so many projects, I’ve learned one thing: listening to honest people is the most valuable --- Consistency sounds simple, but most people haven't really understood what it means. I only recently figured it out --- What does the community feedback say? Has anyone actually used it? Speak up --- If this wave is reliable, we need to seriously consider configuration issues at the bottom range, we can't keep missing opportunities --- To be honest, compared to guessing, I trust systems that can explain themselves more. I can still tell the difference

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFoodie

· 01-08 18:03

ngl this feels like finally having a recipe that actually works every time instead of throwing random ingredients at the wall... SERA's deterministic approach hits different fr

Reply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 01-08 17:51

Yes, the deterministic choice is really quite interesting, significantly better than those random guessing schemes. --- I understand the logic behind SERA's stability this time; finally someone has exposed the randomness issue of AI. --- Deterministic, to put it simply, is to prevent rockets from flying randomly, ensuring they hit the target orbit precisely every time. Brilliant. --- Consistency = moat. This understanding is good; most of the market still relies on luck. --- Wait, if it can truly achieve complete determinism, wouldn't that directly crush existing schemes? That might be a bit over the top. --- How is the community feedback? Can it really stabilize, or is it just marketing hype? --- No guessing, following the optimal path—sounds like finally someone is doing the right thing.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-08 17:45

NGL, the logic of this certainty selection tool sounds pretty good, but can it really produce stable results? Show me some actual cases first.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 01-08 17:43

ngl this is the right path AI should take, deterministic > random trial and error, finally someone has explained this clearly

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037

· 01-08 17:37

ngl, this deterministic selection approach is indeed different from most AI solutions, but the question is whether it can run stably in actual operation...

View OriginalReply0