2026-01-09 20:23:23

If you're not actually verified in the Web3 community but you're out here claiming to be an InfoFi expert, honestly? Don't bother reaching out. The space is full of noise already—we don't need more unverified voices posing as authorities. Credibility matters when you're talking about people's portfolios and financial moves.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiDoctor

· 12m ago

The consultation records show that these self-proclaimed experts without clinical certificates indeed pose a systemic risk. It is recommended that the community regularly verify the credentials of information sources.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 14h ago

That's right, these self-proclaimed "experts" are really annoying.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-09 20:49

Really, these days InfoFi masters are everywhere, and the tactics to harvest retail investors are all pretty much the same.

View OriginalReply0

MindsetExpander

· 01-09 20:48

Really, a bunch of self-proclaimed experts are actually just weirdos who haven't really done anything.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-09 20:47

ngl the "credibility gap" here is actually an interesting attack surface... unverified voices = potential vectors for misinformation cascades. technically speaking, this is how bad implementations compound.

Reply0

CodeSmellHunter