Some figures in the crypto space seem to use inflammatory accusations as engagement bait. When you look at the pattern—like family members and affiliated commentators amplifying serious claims—it raises questions about authenticity. If these allegations were genuine convictions, you'd expect consistency in their public actions and associations. Instead, what we often see is strategic timing around attention cycles. The gap between what people claim to believe and how they actually behave in the industry speaks volumes. It's a reminder to think critically about narratives pushed primarily for clicks and follower engagement, especially when the logical inconsistencies become hard to ignore.