Layer2、Modularization and these concepts are now everywhere, everyone is thinking about how to break through the "Impossible Triangle" of blockchain. But here’s the problem—when transaction volume explodes, who will ensure that this massive amount of data can be efficiently accessed and verified by nodes? This is the real issue at hand.
The recently emerging Walrus protocol, named "Walrus," sounds like it’s about breaking the ice. Its goal is simply to reshape the data availability layer.
In a modular architecture, the execution layer, settlement layer, and data availability layer each have their own roles. The DA layer is like a lifeline, ensuring that transaction data is complete, public, and storable, so that any verifier can download and verify it. This is the foundation of system security and decentralization.
So what’s the current problem? Traditional solutions either rely on the main chain (like Ethereum’s CallData), which is prohibitively expensive; or depend on emerging dedicated DA networks. Walrus is different—it aims to utilize idle storage resources worldwide, from decentralized storage networks (like Filecoin, Arweave) to traditional cloud storage, to build a cheaper, verifiable, censorship-resistant DA market.
On the technical level, it integrates data encoding technologies like erasure coding, with the core idea of handling data more intelligently to ensure security while improving efficiency. This scheme happens to be the missing cornerstone in the modular blockchain stack.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
12
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmare
· 17h ago
Is it the savior of the DA layer again? I always feel like one has appeared in the past two months...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 20h ago
In plain terms, the true bottleneck is the DA layer, and those who previously hyped Layer2 didn't take this seriously.
Walrus wants to create a market using idle storage, which is a good idea, but the key still depends on whether the economic model can hold up—gas fee optimization has reached its limit, is the arbitrage space really here?
Erasure coding schemes are indeed clever, but the real MEV is in the verification stage, so this part needs to be closely monitored.
Wait, if this thing gets widespread, will the data retrieval logic in the mempool change? Are there new opportunities for arbitrage...
CallData is really expensive, but who knows how cheap Walrus can get, it also depends on node centralization.
Honestly, this track is quite interesting; only when costs come down will it truly be disruptive.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 01-10 18:58
The name "Walrus" is really awesome, it instantly gives a sense of breaking the ice.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 01-10 15:10
The name "Walrus" is brilliantly chosen—it's just one word—cold. The DA layer is indeed hitting a bottleneck right now.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 01-10 00:52
The DA layer is indeed the bottleneck, but the Walrus solution needs to undergo an audit before it can be trusted.
Reed-Solomon coding technology itself is fine; the main concern is whether the permission control design is sufficiently rigorous.
To put it simply, the security of any storage layer ultimately depends on the code, and a reentrancy vulnerability can compromise the entire model.
I will wait for third-party audit reports before making judgments on these new protocols.
Modularity sounds fancy, but if the DA design is not careful enough, no matter how much other layers are optimized, it will be useless.
Low cost is an advantage, but never trade security for cost—there have been too many lessons learned from that.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 01-10 00:49
tbh walrus sounds like another "we solved da" narrative drop before the tokenomics dump... actually if you read the contract mechanics, the storage incentive structure is basically filecoin's failed model with erasure codes slapped on top lol. classic exit pump pattern when everyone's obsessing over modular stacks.
Reply0
AirdropFatigue
· 01-10 00:46
Another protocol that sounds really impressive, but how many can actually be implemented and used?
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 01-10 00:40
here's the thing about walrus—erasure codes aren't exactly new, but yeah actually leveraging idle storage at scale? that's where it gets spicy. the DA layer truly is the bottleneck nobody wants to admit exists lmao
Reply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-10 00:36
The name "Walrus" is quite interesting; it really feels like breaking the ice. However, the DA layer has always been a tricky part...
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-10 00:35
Walrus icebreaking? Sounds awesome, but can it really replace CallData's heavenly-level cheapness?
Layer2、Modularization and these concepts are now everywhere, everyone is thinking about how to break through the "Impossible Triangle" of blockchain. But here’s the problem—when transaction volume explodes, who will ensure that this massive amount of data can be efficiently accessed and verified by nodes? This is the real issue at hand.
The recently emerging Walrus protocol, named "Walrus," sounds like it’s about breaking the ice. Its goal is simply to reshape the data availability layer.
In a modular architecture, the execution layer, settlement layer, and data availability layer each have their own roles. The DA layer is like a lifeline, ensuring that transaction data is complete, public, and storable, so that any verifier can download and verify it. This is the foundation of system security and decentralization.
So what’s the current problem? Traditional solutions either rely on the main chain (like Ethereum’s CallData), which is prohibitively expensive; or depend on emerging dedicated DA networks. Walrus is different—it aims to utilize idle storage resources worldwide, from decentralized storage networks (like Filecoin, Arweave) to traditional cloud storage, to build a cheaper, verifiable, censorship-resistant DA market.
On the technical level, it integrates data encoding technologies like erasure coding, with the core idea of handling data more intelligently to ensure security while improving efficiency. This scheme happens to be the missing cornerstone in the modular blockchain stack.