There's a real tension worth examining here—the practice of mandating euphemisms over direct language. When institutions force us to say "unalive" instead of "kill," or similarly rebrand terminology across the board, it mirrors what Orwell warned about: language policing as a tool for thought control. Whether you align with every aspect of that critique or not, this particular mechanism—where certain words become prohibited and sanitized alternatives are imposed—raises genuine questions about censorship and the fluidity of acceptable speech. It's the kind of linguistic transformation that Web3 communities often flag when discussing decentralization and freedom of expression.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwich
· 15h ago
That Orwellian system is truly top-notch. Now, everywhere you see this kind of language censorship... Web3 has been calling for it for a long time. Ultimately, decentralization is still being stifled by control over discourse.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 18h ago
Orwell's meme is back again... But honestly, forcing the use of "unalive" to replace straightforward words is quite strange, and it feels like freedom of speech is gradually decaying.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventually
· 19h ago
Nah, this is a typical struggle for discourse power—institutions define what can be said and what cannot be said... Web3 has been discussing this for a long time. It truly is the last line of defense for freedom of speech.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 01-10 00:56
That Orwellian stuff has really been overused... But to be fair, the term "unalive" is indeed ridiculous, it feels like an insult to our intelligence.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 01-10 00:56
NGL, this is a typical struggle for dominance... The era where institutions call the shots should come to an end.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-10 00:56
That part of Orwell really hit home. The institutional-controlled rhetoric is just a way to control how you think... Web3 needs to continue pushing this topic. Free expression should fundamentally be a basic right.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-10 00:53
NGL, Orwell's ideas are indeed vividly present now... The essence of forced word modification is to control how you think.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 01-10 00:51
Orwell's system is truly overwhelming... The feeling of having your power of speech controlled is so oppressive, ngl
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-10 00:36
This is a typical struggle for discourse power—whoever defines the vocabulary controls the narrative.
Orwell's ideas are now vividly in front of us... institutions forcibly whitewashing language, appearing grandiose on the surface but actually just controlling thought.
Web3 has always been advocating this; decentralization is also meant to break such monopolies.
There's a real tension worth examining here—the practice of mandating euphemisms over direct language. When institutions force us to say "unalive" instead of "kill," or similarly rebrand terminology across the board, it mirrors what Orwell warned about: language policing as a tool for thought control. Whether you align with every aspect of that critique or not, this particular mechanism—where certain words become prohibited and sanitized alternatives are imposed—raises genuine questions about censorship and the fluidity of acceptable speech. It's the kind of linguistic transformation that Web3 communities often flag when discussing decentralization and freedom of expression.