The SEC stablecoin compliance framework is set to be officially implemented in 2026, which presents challenges to traditional cross-border fund flows but also creates new opportunities.
First, let's look at the rigid regulatory requirements. The new framework clearly defines four core clauses: funds must be held in real-time custody by qualified third-party custodians; on-chain transaction data must meet institutional-level audit transparency; cross-border transfers must obtain the payment license of the recipient country; KYC and anti-money laundering processes must cover the entire transaction chain.
These requirements pose real tests to existing solutions. Traditional banking systems take three business days from settlement to receipt, most platforms only support a single asset type, and overseas account opening processes are complex and costly. Clearly, the old methods are no longer viable.
Technological innovation is filling this gap. Some cutting-edge industry architecture designs have inspired us—for example, adopting a dual-country licensing system to ensure global compliance; building T+0 settlement engines that allow stocks to be sold and immediately bought with tokens, eliminating the traditional 3-day waiting period; securing funds through professional custodians and multi-signature technology for double-layer protection; and integrating multiple international settlement channels such as SEPA, SWIFT, and ACH.
These innovations are like opening a dedicated express lane on a congested cross-border payment network—meeting strict regulatory requirements while ensuring fast fund circulation. Looking back after three years, such compatible solutions will become standard infrastructure for cross-border finance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OkxBollingerBandsHot
· 01-10 03:32
It's useless; it will still go up and down regardless.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-10 01:51
Another deadline in 2026. Are we really going to go all out this time? Full-chain KYC coverage is indeed a bit harsh, but T+0 settlement is amazing, faster than traditional banks by a long shot. The dual-license system sounds reliable, but we need to ask who will cover the costs.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 01-10 01:49
Alright, more rule changes... But T+0 settlement is really attractive, finally able to get rid of that three-day ordeal.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-10 01:49
Well... this framework sounds good in theory, but by 2026, how many platforms will actually be able to pull it off?
---
T+0 settlement sounds great, but the costs will increase due to custody and KYC requirements, and in the end, it's still the users who pay the price.
---
Dual licensing system? Feels like another big reshuffle is coming, and a bunch of small platforms will have to shut down.
---
Fast track is fast track, but what about the approval process... Holding so many licenses means endless queues and delays.
---
Basically, it's about money, data, and supervision... the traditional financial system just dressed up in a new outfit.
---
Anyway, I'm just waiting to see who can truly implement this logic. If it were just talk, it should have been proven long ago.
---
Now, stablecoins might really become "stable" things, with an increasing financial flavor.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 01-10 01:44
Will anyone actually implement this framework once it's put into practice? It seems to have a pretty high barrier to entry.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 01-10 01:30
Wait, so in 2026, everything really has to be on-chain for auditing? Those wallet addresses won't be able to run anymore.
Alright, a three-year window period. Let's see who can make compliance work creatively.
From my analysis, if this T+0 settlement engine really gets implemented, traditional banks' three-day waiting period will have to be abolished, and they might go bankrupt directly.
By the way, is this dual national license system meant to please both sides at the same time, or is it that no one can afford to offend anyone?
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-10 01:25
Sounds good in theory, but whether it can actually be implemented depends on who can obtain those licenses... Multi-signature technology sounds impressive, but there's been too much hype lately.
The SEC stablecoin compliance framework is set to be officially implemented in 2026, which presents challenges to traditional cross-border fund flows but also creates new opportunities.
First, let's look at the rigid regulatory requirements. The new framework clearly defines four core clauses: funds must be held in real-time custody by qualified third-party custodians; on-chain transaction data must meet institutional-level audit transparency; cross-border transfers must obtain the payment license of the recipient country; KYC and anti-money laundering processes must cover the entire transaction chain.
These requirements pose real tests to existing solutions. Traditional banking systems take three business days from settlement to receipt, most platforms only support a single asset type, and overseas account opening processes are complex and costly. Clearly, the old methods are no longer viable.
Technological innovation is filling this gap. Some cutting-edge industry architecture designs have inspired us—for example, adopting a dual-country licensing system to ensure global compliance; building T+0 settlement engines that allow stocks to be sold and immediately bought with tokens, eliminating the traditional 3-day waiting period; securing funds through professional custodians and multi-signature technology for double-layer protection; and integrating multiple international settlement channels such as SEPA, SWIFT, and ACH.
These innovations are like opening a dedicated express lane on a congested cross-border payment network—meeting strict regulatory requirements while ensuring fast fund circulation. Looking back after three years, such compatible solutions will become standard infrastructure for cross-border finance.