An intriguing approach to blockchain design: what if computation happens at the user level while verification remains anchored onchain?
Here's how it works in practice: Users execute transactions locally on their clients, then generate cryptographic proofs of that execution. The network operator validates these proofs efficiently without needing to reprocess everything.
The beauty? Privacy becomes structural rather than bolted-on. Since raw transaction details never get exposed to the network, confidentiality is the foundation, not an afterthought. Users maintain control of their data while still benefiting from onchain security guarantees.
This execution-verification separation could reshape how we think about scalability and privacy tradeoffs. Worth watching how this architecture evolves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
An intriguing approach to blockchain design: what if computation happens at the user level while verification remains anchored onchain?
Here's how it works in practice: Users execute transactions locally on their clients, then generate cryptographic proofs of that execution. The network operator validates these proofs efficiently without needing to reprocess everything.
The beauty? Privacy becomes structural rather than bolted-on. Since raw transaction details never get exposed to the network, confidentiality is the foundation, not an afterthought. Users maintain control of their data while still benefiting from onchain security guarantees.
This execution-verification separation could reshape how we think about scalability and privacy tradeoffs. Worth watching how this architecture evolves.