2026-01-11 01:22:37

The current problem is quite clear: within the entire industry chain, there are real incentives totaling between 10 trillion and 20 trillion USD, all driving the continuation of existing methods. But all of this is based on one assumption — that the income growth of end users will be proportional to the increase in computing power.

But is this assumption really valid? That’s the key point.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-ccc36bc5

· 12h ago

Basically, this assumption is inherently flawed.

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 18h ago

Basically, this assumption is a joke. How many people in reality have actually doubled their income?

View OriginalReply0

ApyWhisperer

· 01-11 01:52

Haha, wasn't this assumption supposed to be shattered long ago? Users' income can't keep up with the growth in computing power— isn't that the reality?

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia