In today's crypto community, there is a phenomenon worth pondering: the largest rewards on platforms often flow to the most vulgar content. Deeply original reports and professional analyses are becoming increasingly scarce, while some shoddy accounts (many of which are operated from places like North Macedonia) receive more attention and revenue. What does this incentive structure really aim for? Is it to encourage more in-depth voices, or has it become a hub for low-quality content? The current situation indicates that the platform's incentive mechanism may be pushing in the wrong direction.