Starknet experienced a brief mainnet outage this Monday, and the official team subsequently released an incident analysis report. The issue stemmed from a state inconsistency between the execution layer (blockifier) and the proof layer — specifically, in certain cross-function call and rollback scenarios, the execution layer incorrectly recorded state writes that should have been revoked, ultimately causing transaction execution errors. These affected transactions never received finality confirmation from L1. The incident triggered a chain reorganization, impacting approximately 18 blocks.



This event highlights the fragility of L2 architecture in managing complex states. Coordination issues between the execution layer and the proof layer may seem low probability, but once they occur, they can easily cause chain reactions. The good news is that Starknet's official team promptly identified the problem and published an analysis, and subsequent fixes and risk control upgrades are worth paying attention to. For users, this also serves as a reminder of the risk awareness needed when participating in emerging L2 networks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashRateHustlervip
· 3h ago
It's down again, L2 is still too young. --- Execution layer and proof layer are fighting, and in the end, the transaction suffers. This routine is really clever. --- Reorganized 18 blocks, luckily no liquidation, or it would have been another bloodbath. --- Inconsistent state? Basically, it's a bug in the code. Why make it so fancy? --- Starknet responded quite quickly this time, at least didn't pass the buck, better than some projects. --- Emerging L2s are indeed risky. Better to wait until it's stable before entering; we're not rushing into this trend. --- The logic for cross-function call rollbacks hasn't been thought through clearly. It's too late to catch up now. --- It's good that the problem has been identified. The key is whether the fix quality will pass the test. Let's wait and see. --- This guy is right. Architecture vulnerabilities are mainly afraid of black swan events. One or two times are okay, but after that, who would dare to use it? --- 18 blocks, some lost money, some made money. On the chain, there are no losers—only different winners.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 01-11 02:41
Once again, it's down. If L2 keeps operating like this, will users still dare to engage?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinatorvip
· 01-11 02:40
Another L2 has encountered an issue, this time it's Starknet. The execution layer and the proof layer are at odds, causing 18 blocks to be affected. Fortunately, it didn't escalate into a bigger problem.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 01-11 02:27
It crashed again... This L2 ecosystem really is full of pitfalls at every step.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)