Have you ever experienced this—buying a certain coin and constantly watching its price fluctuations? When it goes up, you secretly celebrate; when it drops, you want to smash the screen. It feels like you're just a pure gambler. But in reality, most people don't care what the project is doing or who is deciding its future direction.
Let me tell you a reality: if you choose a project with real imagination, like holding tokens such as DUSK, it's no longer just a simple "trading" game. The tokens in your hands might be a "voting right" participating in the future financial system's rule design, but many people haven't realized this yet.
**Why do most people fail to see this?**
We've seen too many bad projects in the past—centralized control by the project team, arbitrary token issuance, funds being misappropriated at will, and the community having no way to respond except complaining online. This is a passive state: you can only "vote" by selling tokens, but it can't fundamentally change the situation.
The real breakthrough is entering the era of "active voting." But frankly, the participation rate in governance for most projects is pitifully low. The reasons are simple—voting either involves overly technical content (ordinary users can't understand), or it’s completely irrelevant (feeling disconnected from themselves), or the Gas fees are outrageously high (the cost of voting exceeds the value of the tokens themselves).
Dusk's approach is different. It aims to make governance decisions truly benefit participants, elevating the value of voting rights to another dimension—you are deciding not just on management details, but on core issues that involve the future direction of the entire ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Degen4Breakfast
· 3h ago
Well said, that's exactly how I do it.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 19h ago
That's right, most people do have a gambler's mentality.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 21h ago
That's right, most people just have a pure gambler mentality.
Governance voting sounds good, but the gas fees are really outrageous.
There's a saying: "Since you can't understand it, just keep watching the market."
Wait, can DUSK really change these game rules? I'm a bit skeptical.
Anyway, I just buy and sell now; voting rights are too far away.
The voting cost is more expensive than the tokens, who the hell can stand that?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 01-11 02:55
The data shows that voter turnout is still so low. Let's wait a bit longer.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobia
· 01-11 02:54
You're just bragging again that DUSK is voting rights? Uh... I'm just asking, has anyone actually gone to vote?
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 01-11 02:54
That's right, but most people will still keep watching the market and gambling.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-11 02:50
Basically, most people haven't figured it out.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 01-11 02:44
Exactly right, most people just have a pure gambler mentality.
Governance voting has indeed been underestimated, but gas fees really discourage participation.
I'm not very familiar with Dusk, but this approach is definitely worth looking forward to.
But to be honest, how many people will actually go out and vote?
Have you ever experienced this—buying a certain coin and constantly watching its price fluctuations? When it goes up, you secretly celebrate; when it drops, you want to smash the screen. It feels like you're just a pure gambler. But in reality, most people don't care what the project is doing or who is deciding its future direction.
Let me tell you a reality: if you choose a project with real imagination, like holding tokens such as DUSK, it's no longer just a simple "trading" game. The tokens in your hands might be a "voting right" participating in the future financial system's rule design, but many people haven't realized this yet.
**Why do most people fail to see this?**
We've seen too many bad projects in the past—centralized control by the project team, arbitrary token issuance, funds being misappropriated at will, and the community having no way to respond except complaining online. This is a passive state: you can only "vote" by selling tokens, but it can't fundamentally change the situation.
The real breakthrough is entering the era of "active voting." But frankly, the participation rate in governance for most projects is pitifully low. The reasons are simple—voting either involves overly technical content (ordinary users can't understand), or it’s completely irrelevant (feeling disconnected from themselves), or the Gas fees are outrageously high (the cost of voting exceeds the value of the tokens themselves).
Dusk's approach is different. It aims to make governance decisions truly benefit participants, elevating the value of voting rights to another dimension—you are deciding not just on management details, but on core issues that involve the future direction of the entire ecosystem.