Recently, I came across a project that has found an interesting balance between privacy and compliance. It's called Dusk, and its core selling point is the ability to achieve "trustworthy confidential finance"—sounds like a paradox, but it's not.



The key lies in flexibility. When required by law, users and institutions can selectively disclose transaction information to authorized regulatory agencies or auditors. This sounds simple, but what does it mean? It means privacy is no longer an all-or-nothing choice.

What are the benefits of this design? It directly adapts to regulated financial frameworks like MiFID II and MiCA. This is especially attractive to institutional investors—meeting regulatory requirements without completely sacrificing privacy protection. It creates a third path between traditional encryption solutions and fully transparent financial systems.

In plain terms, it achieves privacy through design, maintaining transparency when necessary. It neither sacrifices security nor bypasses compliance. For crypto projects aiming to enter the mainstream, this approach is definitely worth paying attention to.
DUSK-10,78%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-12 18:31
Oh, isn't this just wanting to have the best of both worlds? --- Selective disclosure sounds good, but can we really trust it? --- Finally someone thought of this move, the institutions should be happy. --- The path of compliance is getting narrower and narrower, but Dusk's approach is indeed interesting. --- Wait, in this case, is the information seen by auditors complete or incomplete? --- The official military route has always been the future direction, got it. --- Can privacy and compliance be satisfied at the same time? Sounds like a pipe dream. --- MiFID II framework is too complicated, can it really be fully adapted? --- Thumbs up, at least there are projects taking this seriously. --- Sounds good, but the key is to see how the actual implementation works.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagicvip
· 01-11 02:56
It sounds a bit like you can have your cake and eat it too, but I still have some doubts. The logic of selective disclosure sounds nice, but what happens when regulators really come knocking? Will institutions really buy into this, or is it just another marketing stunt? Compliance is a very complex issue; can Dusk really make it through? Ultimately, it seems like some compromise will have to be made on one side or the other.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 01-11 02:49
Haha, someone finally figured this out.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamonvip
· 01-11 02:46
Xiong Xiong took a look at Dusk's technical architecture, and the Sharpe ratio really is the ceiling in the privacy compliance balance.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 01-11 02:42
The selling points are good, but can it really be implemented? --- Privacy + compliance, I've seen too many PPT presentations on this balance. --- Dusk's approach is very friendly to institutions, but it still depends on the trading experience. --- It's another case of selective disclosure... Will regulators really buy it? --- The third option sounds great, but let's wait until it's actually launched. --- This is the kind of serious project that should have this kind of attitude. --- Turning privacy into adjustable parameters is interesting... just worried about misuse. --- MiFID II compliance is indeed a pain point for large institutions, and Dusk seems to address that. --- Feels like walking a tightrope, one misstep and neither side benefits. --- Not sacrificing security while meeting compliance? I’m on board with this idea.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdropsvip
· 01-11 02:31
Oh, isn't this a perfect solution that combines both money and privacy? --- Regulatory approval is necessary for institutions to dare to play, interesting. --- Selective disclosure? Sounds like there might be a backdoor... --- Finally, someone has figured it out. Privacy and compliance are really not mortal enemies. --- Can this logic hold up? I'm a bit worried. --- As long as MiFID II is recognized, the money will follow the past. --- The flexibility in this design is indeed quite good, worth a look. --- Compared to those pure privacy coins, this approach is more realistic. --- The good way to put it is the third path; the harsh way to put it is compromise. --- Institutional investors are the real bosses, no wonder it's so hard to please them.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt