Companies spend millions every year on so-called "data security" services, only to find that what they're really buying is a blank check of trust from cloud providers and security firms saying, "Rest assured, we won't mess around." This phenomenon reveals an absurdity in the enterprise data market: sky-high security investments are essentially paying for trust.
But the reality is harsh. Repeated data breaches in history have proven that trust-based security defenses are incredibly fragile.
The combination of cryptography and decentralized networks is rewriting this landscape. Solutions that ensure data security through mathematics rather than promises are beginning to emerge. You no longer need to believe in a company's vow; you only need to believe in mathematics—sounds a bit sci-fi, but the technology is already on the way.
The Walrus protocol is doing exactly that. It combines the Red Stuff algorithm with the coordination layer of the Sui blockchain, resulting in two key advantages: first, storage costs have plummeted, and efficient encoding and distribution prevent single points of failure from affecting data integrity; second, data control is refined to the utmost, with smart contracts capable of implementing complex access control logic.
It sounds promising in theory, but how does it perform in practice?
The Alkimi Exchange case—a decentralized advertising platform handling over 25 million ad impressions daily—is very convincing. Under traditional schemes, managing such data involves massive audit costs and privacy risks. Now? All data is encrypted and managed through Walrus's Seal system.
Advertisers can independently verify whether ad placements are genuine, and user privacy is protected throughout with encryption—neither the platform nor anyone else can peek into user information. The result? Alkimi saves huge audit costs and no longer needs to make those "we are very secure" promises.
Verifiability itself becomes the strongest proof of security.
Here's an economic logic: previously, companies either spent large sums on cloud providers like AWS or paid hefty fees to audit firms. Now, some of that expenditure can be redirected to pay for decentralized networks. From this perspective, the value of the protocol's tokens is positively correlated with the trust savings they enable.
Even more interestingly, Walrus is pioneering a new category—verifiable data services. When enough enterprises realize that security should be a mathematically verifiable state rather than a verbal promise bought with money, a large-scale migration wave will follow.
The question now is: will you continue to pay the "trust tax," or are you ready to embrace a trustless future?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyOnMainnet
· 2h ago
It's really just spending money to buy peace of mind. You can tell from each data breach incident.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 7h ago
I'm serious. The idea of selling trust as a commodity should have been revolutionary long ago.
---
Wait, math really can't replace human greed. How can we ensure there are no new tricks in decentralized networks?
---
The Alkimi case saved a big chunk of auditing fees. By the way, did this money end up flowing into the token?
---
Another wave of "trustless" marketing, but I'm more concerned about whether the Walrus protocol will encounter issues once it’s truly operational.
---
Finally, someone has explained the concept of "trust tax" thoroughly. Companies should reflect on this.
---
The Red Stuff algorithm combined with the Sui coordination layer sounds impressive, but can it hold up in real large-scale applications?
---
No more talk. I agree that cryptography is more reliable than verbal promises, but how long the cost advantage can last is a question.
---
The Alkimi example really hit the point, but it's not enough to prove that a complete paradigm shift has truly arrived.
---
If the platform itself can't even see user data, that's a selling point in Web3. But in Web2 companies' eyes, it might be a nightmare.
---
So in the end, it's all about economics: migrate when it's cheap, keep getting exploited when it's expensive. Human nature.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-11 02:52
Good grief, it's that cloud vendor trick again... It sounds great to say that math doesn't lie, but would companies really bet everything on Walrus?
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-11 02:49
The term "trust tax" is brilliant; companies spend millions every year just to pay protection fees to cloud giants and auditing firms.
Mathematical verification is much more reliable than empty promises. This time, Walrus has really hit the pain point.
The Alkimi case is quite practical; saving on audit costs and enabling encryption makes users comfortable.
I'm just worried about the protocol's maturity, as large-scale adoption hasn't exploded yet.
If the SUI ecosystem can truly reduce security costs this time, a migration wave could indeed happen.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 01-11 02:47
The term "trust tax" is brilliant. Basically, it's like paying for the big companies' PPTs.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-11 02:45
Having paid trust taxes for so many years, it's about time to change your approach.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-11 02:44
Really, cloud providers now rely on trust to operate. One leak and the entire system collapses.
This wave of decentralized data security is quite impressive; mathematics is much more reliable than promises.
The Walrus case looks good, but the ecosystem is still too small. Let's wait and see if it can truly scale up.
Don't celebrate too early; the key is whether companies are willing to migrate.
Can costs really be reduced this much? I find it hard to believe. What about the details?
As for the value of protocol tokens, it sounds like storytelling. Let the data speak.
Let's continue to be cut as leeks; anyway, change is too slow.
Companies spend millions every year on so-called "data security" services, only to find that what they're really buying is a blank check of trust from cloud providers and security firms saying, "Rest assured, we won't mess around." This phenomenon reveals an absurdity in the enterprise data market: sky-high security investments are essentially paying for trust.
But the reality is harsh. Repeated data breaches in history have proven that trust-based security defenses are incredibly fragile.
The combination of cryptography and decentralized networks is rewriting this landscape. Solutions that ensure data security through mathematics rather than promises are beginning to emerge. You no longer need to believe in a company's vow; you only need to believe in mathematics—sounds a bit sci-fi, but the technology is already on the way.
The Walrus protocol is doing exactly that. It combines the Red Stuff algorithm with the coordination layer of the Sui blockchain, resulting in two key advantages: first, storage costs have plummeted, and efficient encoding and distribution prevent single points of failure from affecting data integrity; second, data control is refined to the utmost, with smart contracts capable of implementing complex access control logic.
It sounds promising in theory, but how does it perform in practice?
The Alkimi Exchange case—a decentralized advertising platform handling over 25 million ad impressions daily—is very convincing. Under traditional schemes, managing such data involves massive audit costs and privacy risks. Now? All data is encrypted and managed through Walrus's Seal system.
Advertisers can independently verify whether ad placements are genuine, and user privacy is protected throughout with encryption—neither the platform nor anyone else can peek into user information. The result? Alkimi saves huge audit costs and no longer needs to make those "we are very secure" promises.
Verifiability itself becomes the strongest proof of security.
Here's an economic logic: previously, companies either spent large sums on cloud providers like AWS or paid hefty fees to audit firms. Now, some of that expenditure can be redirected to pay for decentralized networks. From this perspective, the value of the protocol's tokens is positively correlated with the trust savings they enable.
Even more interestingly, Walrus is pioneering a new category—verifiable data services. When enough enterprises realize that security should be a mathematically verifiable state rather than a verbal promise bought with money, a large-scale migration wave will follow.
The question now is: will you continue to pay the "trust tax," or are you ready to embrace a trustless future?