I noticed this project at the 3m price level, mainly because top on-chain addresses have been building positions. These high-level players usually conduct in-depth research before taking action, so my understanding of this track has elevated to a new level.
From both a technical perspective and operational execution, this project indeed has the potential to be a dark horse. If the team can keep up with the subsequent operational rhythm, a market valuation of 30m is not unreasonable. The key still depends on whether the project team can deliver; after all, there are many competitors in the market now, and differentiated operations are the key to breaking through.
For early-stage projects like this, the focus should still be on on-chain activity and community consensus accumulation. So far, the data looks quite healthy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropBuffet
· 01-13 14:55
Following the big players is fine, but I'm worried the team might drop the ball later.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 01-13 03:06
Copying the header address, I’m familiar with this routine, but entering at 3m is indeed a bit interesting. Let’s see if the team can hold up in the future.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 01-12 12:27
Things that big trend followers jump into are indeed worth checking out, but a 30m valuation? It depends on whether the team can really come up with some innovative ideas.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 01-11 04:04
Copying the main address, this wave should be stable... but it still depends on whether the team can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 01-11 04:04
Following the top addresses is all that matters; anyway, if they lose, I don't lose.
View OriginalReply0
LightningAllInHero
· 01-11 03:55
Building positions with big influencers and then jumping on board directly—this strategy has worked for many years... Does it still work now?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 01-11 03:50
Projects that big investors jump into are definitely worth checking out. A $30M valuation sounds quite bold, but delivering on that is the real challenge.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 01-11 03:48
Head wallet copy trading... definitely need to keep a close eye
Following in means just waiting for delivery, otherwise 30 minutes is pointless
On-chain data looks okay, but be cautious of operational drop-offs
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 01-11 03:39
Following the big players' accumulation, it's a gamble on their research depth. But when it comes to deliverability... what's politely called potential, what's harsh is a gamble on character.
I noticed this project at the 3m price level, mainly because top on-chain addresses have been building positions. These high-level players usually conduct in-depth research before taking action, so my understanding of this track has elevated to a new level.
From both a technical perspective and operational execution, this project indeed has the potential to be a dark horse. If the team can keep up with the subsequent operational rhythm, a market valuation of 30m is not unreasonable. The key still depends on whether the project team can deliver; after all, there are many competitors in the market now, and differentiated operations are the key to breaking through.
For early-stage projects like this, the focus should still be on on-chain activity and community consensus accumulation. So far, the data looks quite healthy.