Institutions entering the market need more than flashy PPTs; they require structural trust.
Existing L2 solutions expose transaction details to the entire network, which poses significant business and strategic risks for financial institutions. Architectures centered around sequencers also carry the risks of censorship and single points of failure.
@0xMiden has chosen a more challenging but correct path: execution based on zero-knowledge proofs. Transactions are executed locally, with only verifiable proofs recorded on the chain. This achieves true data confidentiality, verifiability, and decentralization, providing institutions with a compliance foundation that requires no compromises.
Trust should stem from mathematics and architecture, not promises. $MIDEN
@0xMiden @KaitoAI, #Yaps、#KaitoAI
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Institutions entering the market need more than flashy PPTs; they require structural trust.
Existing L2 solutions expose transaction details to the entire network, which poses significant business and strategic risks for financial institutions. Architectures centered around sequencers also carry the risks of censorship and single points of failure.
@0xMiden has chosen a more challenging but correct path: execution based on zero-knowledge proofs. Transactions are executed locally, with only verifiable proofs recorded on the chain. This achieves true data confidentiality, verifiability, and decentralization, providing institutions with a compliance foundation that requires no compromises.
Trust should stem from mathematics and architecture, not promises. $MIDEN
@0xMiden @KaitoAI, #Yaps、#KaitoAI