This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The part no one brought up about Claude blocking APIs:
denying inference = power
If a platform can throttle you, hot-swap a cheaper checkpoint, or gate tools behind policy, it owns your operating tempo.
A quota you didn’t agree to.
A route you can’t see.
A “compliance” decision that shows up as latency and missing calls.
And everyone treats it like a product change.
It’s not.
It’s governance, at runtime.
We’re already watching it happen.
Today they cut access for “rivals.”
Tomorrow it’s “risk.”
So no, DeAI isn’t ideology to me.
It’s resilience engineering.
Because once inference is critical infrastructure, your “provider” becomes a counterparty with two knobs: pricing + permission.
And those knobs only ever turn one direction.