Among many public chain projects, Dusk Foundation has taken a less common path—focusing on blockchain infrastructure for financial scenarios. This is not just a marketing concept, but a systemic difference that runs through research and development, design, architecture, and security.
It's easy to say, but hard to do. The financial market cannot tolerate any mistakes, and Dusk's entire technical system revolves around this principle.
**How strict are the R&D standards?**
Ordinary public chains pursue throughput and ease of use, with relatively lenient tolerance for low-probability bugs. But financial-grade applications do not accept this—Dusk sets the standard as "zero tolerance." How is this achieved? Core code must undergo more than three rounds of independent audits, with authoritative organizations like CertiK and OpenZeppelin reviewing it. Before any new feature goes live, it must run in a simulated environment for at least 3 months to ensure it does not affect the stability of existing transactions.
It sounds like a lengthy process, but this is the reality for financial-grade applications. A single failure could shake the entire market.
**How does technological iteration work?**
From the early SBA protocol to the current PoS consensus upgrade, from privacy engine optimization to modular architecture refinement, every step is not about chasing trends. Dusk's technical choices all point to the same goal—financial-grade security, controllability, compliance, and flexible adaptability.
This differentiated construction logic determines its fundamental difference from other public chains.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblind
· 01-11 22:50
Zero-tolerance is indeed tough, with three rounds of audits + 3 months of simulation testing... Other public chains must have been eager to go live long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-11 22:49
I've long said that the financial track is the true commanding height of blockchain. While others are still playing with throughput, Dusk is already laying out the future.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 01-11 22:44
Zero tolerance? Sounds like you're building a banking system. That's the true way a blockchain should be.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-11 22:41
Real financial-grade infrastructure is about being this meticulous, unlike some public chains that boast innovation every day but actually encounter issues after just a few steps.
Among many public chain projects, Dusk Foundation has taken a less common path—focusing on blockchain infrastructure for financial scenarios. This is not just a marketing concept, but a systemic difference that runs through research and development, design, architecture, and security.
It's easy to say, but hard to do. The financial market cannot tolerate any mistakes, and Dusk's entire technical system revolves around this principle.
**How strict are the R&D standards?**
Ordinary public chains pursue throughput and ease of use, with relatively lenient tolerance for low-probability bugs. But financial-grade applications do not accept this—Dusk sets the standard as "zero tolerance." How is this achieved? Core code must undergo more than three rounds of independent audits, with authoritative organizations like CertiK and OpenZeppelin reviewing it. Before any new feature goes live, it must run in a simulated environment for at least 3 months to ensure it does not affect the stability of existing transactions.
It sounds like a lengthy process, but this is the reality for financial-grade applications. A single failure could shake the entire market.
**How does technological iteration work?**
From the early SBA protocol to the current PoS consensus upgrade, from privacy engine optimization to modular architecture refinement, every step is not about chasing trends. Dusk's technical choices all point to the same goal—financial-grade security, controllability, compliance, and flexible adaptability.
This differentiated construction logic determines its fundamental difference from other public chains.