CryptoQuant CEO Warns X Is Targeting Crypto Instead of Fixing Bot Problem

Source: Coindoo Original Title: CryptoQuant CEO Warns X Is Targeting Crypto Instead of Fixing Bot Problem Original Link: Ki Young Ju, founder of CryptoQuant, has publicly taken aim at X, accusing the platform of mishandling its crypto community while failing to control an explosion of automated spam.

In his view, X’s response has focused on throttling crypto-related content instead of fixing the bot problem that caused the issue in the first place.

Key takeaways:

• Crypto-related posts on X are increasingly being suppressed due to bot-driven spam waves.
• Automated accounts linked to “crypto” activity surged by over 1,200% in a single day.
• Legitimate crypto users are losing reach as algorithmic filters target low-quality content.
• Paid verification is failing to deter bots and may be amplifying spam instead.

In a post published on Sunday, Ju shared data showing an extreme surge in automated activity linked to the word “crypto.” According to his figures, more than 7.7 million posts containing the keyword were generated in a single day, representing an increase of over 1,200% compared with normal levels. He argued that this wave of low-quality, bot-driven content has triggered aggressive algorithmic filters that are now sweeping up legitimate crypto accounts as collateral damage.

As AI advances, bots are inevitable. The real problem is X’s failure to distinguish bots from humans. The verified paywall failed, and bots now pay to spam. It is absurd that X would rather ban crypto than improve its bot detection.

Ju acknowledged that bots are becoming unavoidable as artificial intelligence improves, but said the real failure lies in X’s inability to reliably separate automated behavior from genuine human users. He also criticized the platform’s paid verification model, claiming it no longer acts as a quality filter. Instead, he argued, it enables bots to simply pay for visibility, while real users see their reach shrink.

Calling the situation “absurd,” Ju said it makes little sense for X to effectively penalize an entire sector like crypto rather than invest in stronger bot-detection systems.

Overposting debate deepens divide within Crypto Twitter

The criticism follows comments from Nikita Bier, who recently suggested that Crypto Twitter’s declining visibility is partly self-inflicted. Bier explained that many crypto accounts exhaust their daily reach limits by posting or replying too frequently, often with repetitive or low-value content. As a result, when those same accounts later share meaningful updates or analysis, their posts struggle to gain traction.

Bier argued that the issue is less about algorithmic suppression and more about posting behavior, noting that users only see a limited number of posts per day. Excessive activity, he said, effectively dilutes an account’s own visibility. His comments sparked backlash within crypto circles, with some users accusing X of sidelining a community that remains central to the platform’s engagement.

Despite the ongoing friction, X continues to function as the primary real-time communication hub for the crypto industry. Traders, developers, analysts, and investors still rely on the platform to exchange market insights, track onchain data, and react to breaking news faster than on any other social network.

X has also been positioning itself for deeper integration with financial and messaging tools. Last year, the company introduced XChats, a new messaging feature that Elon Musk said would support advanced encryption inspired by Bitcoin, along with audio and video calls, disappearing messages, file sharing, and a rebuilt infrastructure based on the Rust programming language.

As tensions between the platform and the crypto community continue to surface, the debate highlights a growing challenge for social networks: balancing spam control, monetization, and free reach in an era where automated content is increasingly difficult to distinguish from real human participation.