Interesting comparison: DOG is listed on a major exchange with a relatively transparent and fair process, while projects like Testnet Memes on another top exchange are filled with reserved shares for VCs, project teams, and insiders. This reflects the differences in token distribution mechanisms and ecosystem governance across platforms—one emphasizing fairness, the other leaning toward centralized allocation. When choosing an exchange, looking at the project's token unlock schedule and initial distribution plan often reveals the underlying ecosystem logic of the platform.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonlightGamer
· 01-12 00:29
Really, this is just about judging people, some exchanges just don't bother pretending anymore.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 01-11 22:57
It's the same old VC trick of cutting leeks again. Testnet Memes was directly eaten by insiders, and retail investors who get in are just bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 01-11 22:51
Damn it, it's the same old scam to cut the leeks. Venture capitalists and insiders have long been well-fed.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-11 22:49
It has been proven that to determine whether an exchange is reliable, you need to examine its token distribution table... The reserved funds for venture capital are truly a security risk, even more dangerous than protocol architecture issues.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 01-11 22:41
Basically, it's a matter of platform stance. The concept of fairness sounds nice, but in the end, it all comes down to who has more backing from the big sponsors behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 01-11 22:39
To be honest, that's why I have to go through the token allocation table for each exchange I choose now. There are too many insider deals.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 01-11 22:33
Basically, it's the same old trick; fair distribution is just talk. The key is who is behind the scenes.
Interesting comparison: DOG is listed on a major exchange with a relatively transparent and fair process, while projects like Testnet Memes on another top exchange are filled with reserved shares for VCs, project teams, and insiders. This reflects the differences in token distribution mechanisms and ecosystem governance across platforms—one emphasizing fairness, the other leaning toward centralized allocation. When choosing an exchange, looking at the project's token unlock schedule and initial distribution plan often reveals the underlying ecosystem logic of the platform.