2026-01-11 22:32:22

Recent platform changes have shown meaningful improvements in content moderation practices. The shift away from arbitrary restrictions and heavy-handed censorship has been pretty noticeable compared to earlier periods.

That said, the algorithm itself seems to be heading in the wrong direction, particularly when it comes to crypto Twitter discussions. The feed quality has definitely taken a hit. If something doesn't adjust with how content gets prioritized and distributed, we're likely to see more user frustration. The algorithm needs a real rethink to balance visibility for quality crypto discourse.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCryBaby

· 17h ago

I think the review has improved, but the algorithm part really fell flat, and all the crypto discussions have been buried.

View OriginalReply0

NeverPresent

· 01-12 04:12

The algorithm part really sucks, and crypto topics are even more severely affected.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-11 23:02

Algorithms are really disappointing; all discussions about encryption are drowned out.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-11 23:00

The review has improved a lot, but the algorithm still sucks, especially for discussions in the crypto circle. The feed is almost unreadable now.

View OriginalReply0

LonelyAnchorman

· 01-11 22:59

The algorithm part is really lacking, and there's no visibility in crypto discussions at all.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 01-11 22:53

The algorithm part really sucks, and crypto discussions are completely drowned out.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 01-11 22:35

Have you noticed that even after approval, the algorithm actually pulled back? This is a classic case of the left hand letting go while the right hand pinches. Content moderation is done well, but the feed quality for crypto discussions has directly plummeted, which is ridiculous. According to supply and demand curves, high-quality crypto discourse is now seriously undervalued, and the floor price has been broken through. The problem with the algorithm mechanism is essentially a lack of DAO governance awareness; it’s the tragedy of purely centralized decision-making. The current feed quality perfectly exemplifies the philosophy of a bear market, but I’m still all in on high-quality content because there will always be a rebound someday. So the core issue isn’t moderation, but rather a problem with the supply side of the distribution mechanism. Those who understand, understand.

View OriginalReply0