Are open-source codes legally responsible for users' improper use? The Roman Storm case once again puts this issue in the spotlight. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin spoke out in defense of Tornado Cash developers, arguing that such prosecutions represent a form of "improper criminalization" of code. Behind this controversy lies a deeper question: in the era of decentralization, what kind of responsibilities should open-source developers bear?

ETH2,42%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastervip
· 01-11 23:51
If this logic were to really hold, then even calculator developers would have to be responsible for black-market accounting? Ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplantvip
· 01-11 23:48
This logic is really outrageous. Just writing some code makes you an accomplice? Does that mean the person who makes guns should also be responsible for every bullet?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfervip
· 01-11 23:47
Something's off. If this logic really holds, then even the person who wrote the calculator would have to take the blame? The code itself is innocent.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDipsvip
· 01-11 23:44
If this logic holds, then programming language developers would also have to end up in jail...
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibesvip
· 01-11 23:25
This logic is completely ridiculous. Should code be used for human rights exploitation? Then knife manufacturers should also be held responsible for stabbing incidents.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)