Having been involved in the Web3 and traditional finance integration track for over a year, I have seen through many project tricks. There are quite a few projects that loudly promote RWA (Real-World Assets), but very few that truly pass the basic compliance threshold. Among them, there are also quite a few privacy public chains with solid technical strength, but upon closer inspection, they have long since completely abandoned regulatory requirements, ultimately only speaking to niche circles and never breaking through that ceiling.
During that time, I kept asking myself: Can Web3 and traditional finance truly achieve deep integration? Are privacy and compliance inherently opposed? This doubt followed me like a shadow until about half a year ago when I finally saw a turning point.
After coming into contact with a public chain focused on financial scenarios, my perspective changed. From carefully studying the technical architecture documents, to testing on-chain functions myself, and tracking ecosystem deployment progress one by one, the questions that haunted me finally found answers. Looking back now, the logic of this project is actually very clear—it never forces you to choose between privacy and compliance. Instead, starting from the underlying architecture, it forcibly integrates these two seemingly opposing needs, exploring a public chain direction tailored for financial scenarios. Its native token is precisely the backbone that connects the entire ecosystem.
I first noticed this project while researching compliant blockchain fields in Europe. It was developed by a Dutch team, received early backing from leading industry institutions, and established deep cooperation with licensed exchanges. These two points alone are enough to be eye-catching—it's well known that European financial regulation is among the strictest worldwide, and being able to take root and stand firm in such an environment speaks volumes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-12 18:21
Hmm... It sounds like another narrative of "solving the privacy and compliance conflict." I heard this phrase back in 2022, and what was the result?
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 01-11 23:51
To be honest, after looking at so many RWA projects, most of them are just theoretical discussions... Truly capable of balancing compliance and privacy are a rare breed.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 01-11 23:51
Finally, someone has explained thoroughly the relationship between compliance and privacy, which have always been at odds. I also used to be driven crazy by these two issues. The Dutch team's move is indeed tough; under the European regulatory framework, only the tough ones survive.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 01-11 23:47
Haha, finally someone dares to speak frankly about the true nature of these projects. Most RWA projects are just PPT dream builders, and compliance is not even considered.
Having been involved in the Web3 and traditional finance integration track for over a year, I have seen through many project tricks. There are quite a few projects that loudly promote RWA (Real-World Assets), but very few that truly pass the basic compliance threshold. Among them, there are also quite a few privacy public chains with solid technical strength, but upon closer inspection, they have long since completely abandoned regulatory requirements, ultimately only speaking to niche circles and never breaking through that ceiling.
During that time, I kept asking myself: Can Web3 and traditional finance truly achieve deep integration? Are privacy and compliance inherently opposed? This doubt followed me like a shadow until about half a year ago when I finally saw a turning point.
After coming into contact with a public chain focused on financial scenarios, my perspective changed. From carefully studying the technical architecture documents, to testing on-chain functions myself, and tracking ecosystem deployment progress one by one, the questions that haunted me finally found answers. Looking back now, the logic of this project is actually very clear—it never forces you to choose between privacy and compliance. Instead, starting from the underlying architecture, it forcibly integrates these two seemingly opposing needs, exploring a public chain direction tailored for financial scenarios. Its native token is precisely the backbone that connects the entire ecosystem.
I first noticed this project while researching compliant blockchain fields in Europe. It was developed by a Dutch team, received early backing from leading industry institutions, and established deep cooperation with licensed exchanges. These two points alone are enough to be eye-catching—it's well known that European financial regulation is among the strictest worldwide, and being able to take root and stand firm in such an environment speaks volumes.