2026-01-12 00:22:04

Recently, I have been researching the decentralized storage and data availability track and found the Walrus project to be quite interesting.

Their core innovation lies in how to address the security and scalability of data storage. By combining efficient data sharding techniques with innovative storage verification mechanisms, Walrus has built a more reliable data infrastructure for Web3 applications. Think about it—amidst the explosion of multi-chain ecosystems, the value of such underlying protocols will only become more prominent—no matter how many applications there are, without a stable data layer to support them, it’s all in vain.

From an economic model perspective, the WAL token’s design is not just about incentives. Developers use it to deploy and maintain application data, node operators earn verification rewards through it, and ordinary users can also participate in network building—all roles within the ecosystem can find their own value points. This multi-layered incentive design precisely demonstrates that the problems this network aims to solve indeed have market demand.

Decentralized storage is still in its early stages, but as the complexity of Web3 applications increases, the demand for data infrastructure is also rising. The emergence of protocols like Walrus fills this gap perfectly. It’s worth continuing to observe the progress of this project in ecosystem development.

WAL1,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiTooHigh

· 1h ago

The data layer is indeed a heavily overlooked track, and Walrus's sharding solution seems to be genuinely working on it, unlike some storage projects that only talk about stories.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-12 00:51

The data sharding mechanism sounds good, but I am more concerned about whether their validation logic has undergone rigorous auditing. The lessons from last year's IPFS ecosystem re-entrancy vulnerabilities are still fresh; if the underlying protocol encounters issues, the entire chain could collapse.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-12 00:51

To be honest, the data layer is indeed something that needs attention, but can Walrus's approach really run? It still seems that shard verification depends on actual implementation. WAL's incentive design is quite thoughtful, but I'm worried it might fall into the old pattern of hype driving up prices and then the ecosystem cooling down. In the decentralized storage space, competition is fierce. Arweave and Filecoin have been around for years. Can newcomers really break through? Early projects are always like this—seemingly perfect logic, but once they scale up, all sorts of issues emerge. It mainly depends on how many developers they can attract. No matter how good the infrastructure is, if no one uses it, it's just a display. The underlying protocol is indeed easy to overlook, but that's also why truly useful storage protocols can last so long. Walrus's approach is good, but will node distribution become centralized? That's what I care most about.

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 01-12 00:49

data sharding is just fancy copium if the verification mechanism can't scale with actual tx volume... let me run the numbers on this one

Reply0

GasFeeAssassin

· 01-12 00:44

The data layer has indeed been seriously underestimated. Just thinking about trading coins is useless; infrastructure is the future.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 01-12 00:31

Damn, the data layer is indeed a neglected pain point. Walrus's approach is actually quite good. The WAL incentive model doesn't seem to be as exploitative, which is a bit interesting. If you enter early, what kind of price can you get? The underlying protocol is like this—unassuming but crucial at critical moments. Keep watching.

View OriginalReply0