2026-01-12 00:23:15

Recently, I’ve been looking into a project with a somewhat unique operational mechanism.

The project's background is quite solid: developed by a leading launch platform, backed by institutional investors, listed on 13 exchanges, and with participation from a top 100 community alliance in ecosystem development. These fundamentals are all in place.

But what truly attracts attention is its tokenomics design. The project employs a 3% slippage entry mechanism combined with an automated market maker logic, creating an interesting cycle: when trading volume or accumulated fees reach 0.1 BNB, the system automatically triggers a buy-up and burn process, executed once every minute.

From a data perspective, it looks like this—

If the trading volume reaches 4.5 million USD, the corresponding burn fund pool will have 13,500 USD (3% of the trading volume), roughly equivalent to 148 BNB. At a burn rate of 0.1 BNB per minute, this fund can support continuous buy-up and burn for 24 hours.

Doubling the trading volume to 9 million USD, the burn fund pool becomes 256 BNB, supporting 48 hours of continuous burning.

Doubling again to 18 million USD, the fund pool reaches 512 BNB, enough to sustain 4 days of ongoing burns.

This mechanism creates an interesting positive feedback loop—larger trading volume leads to more accumulated burn funds, which in turn amplifies the buy-up and burn strength and duration. This cycle can attract more participants, pushing trading volume higher. It sounds like a self-reinforcing "snowball" effect.

Of course, how far this innovative mechanism can go depends on actual execution and market acceptance. But from a design perspective, it indeed reflects some new ideas.

BNB2,62%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayerZeroJunkie

· 01-13 00:10

It sounds like the usual automatic pump and dump scheme, 0.1BNB per minute? Feels like just a new way to scam people out of their money. A 3% slippage entry mechanism clearly looks like bloodsucking; the larger the trading volume, the more you lose. I just can't quite understand this logic. Hearing about institutions backing 13 exchanges so often, but the key is whether there's real trading volume behind it. Otherwise, it's all talk. This kind of positive feedback loop sounds exciting, but when will it crash? It could happen at any minute... What is the Top 100 Community Alliance? Just hearing the name feels shady. Do truly capable projects need such a title?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-12 11:14

On-chain data looks great, but I still want to see if there's a backdoor in the logic triggered by that 0.1BNB in the contract...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHermit

· 01-12 00:53

This mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether trading volume can really pick up, otherwise it's just empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 01-12 00:52

It sounds like an automatic pump machine; the bigger the trading volume, the crazier it gets. --- Both slippage and destruction—can this design not collapse? --- Haha, 13 exchanges just want to sell me stories? I only care about whether I can withdraw. --- Positive feedback? Basically, it's a Ponzi scheme trick. --- If it were a healthy cycle, there would be no need to post hype. --- Compared to those dead projects, this mechanism doesn't seem to have anything new. --- Pumping and destruction—this routine is everywhere; the key is who is the one manipulating. --- Top 100 Community Alliance? That’s probably just a marketing term. --- In the end, the snowball effect still hits the last batch of people; everyone knows how it works.

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 01-12 00:51

Sounds good, but I still can't quite grasp this automatic pump-and-destroy logic. Can it really cycle on its own? --- Both slippage and destruction, it feels a bit complicated. Can you explain it simply? --- Wait, if trading volume doubles, the destruction funds double too. Does that math add up? I find it hard to understand. --- 13 exchanges sound like a lot, but have they reviewed such a mysterious mechanism before launching? --- Pump-and-destroy, on the surface, is a positive cycle. But honestly, what does it look like in a negative sense? --- Hold on, if destruction happens every minute, how much liquidity is left in the pool? --- What is the Hundred Community Alliance? Does this endorsement really carry weight? --- I just want to know, what happens to this automatic system in a bear market? Can it hold up?

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-12 00:49

lmao the "positive feedback loop" angle is cute but like... technically speaking, this is just dressed-up ponzi mechanics with extra steps. the 3% slippage tax funding continuous buybacks? *sigh* seen this movie before, ser. show me the formal verification or it's vaporware.

Reply0