Recently, I took a shot on a project within the Solana ecosystem, mainly because I was attracted by its background story. The project directly used visual design elements from a major exchange, and it claims to be the earliest token on the Solana network to adopt this kind of branding strategy. It sounds quite interesting, but it also raises some doubts.



This also prompted me to think about the decision-making structure of the project. Core management roles like the CTO should really be made by a single individual rather than a team-based approach. The reason is simple—once multiple people are involved, the trust chain can easily break. You can never fully confirm the true intentions and decision logic of your teammates, especially when it comes to branding, assets, and community reputation. Sometimes, what seems like negotiation and cooperation can instead become an excuse for passing the buck and shirking responsibility.
SOL-1,78%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOSapienvip
· 01-12 12:43
Is that all? Copying the exchange UI and still have the nerve to say it's the earliest. Now Solana projects are really collectively lacking creativity. Relying on a CTO alone to make decisions isn't reliable; it's better to see who the founder is. Did you read the whitepaper before rushing in? Single-person decision-making is actually more prone to rug pulls. Don't deceive yourself. Projects with a good story are often... you know.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrunvip
· 01-12 00:53
The story is good, but this kind of blatant copying of design elements is just too obvious and outrageous. Deciding alone sounds cool, but what if this guy wants to run away... At least with a multi-person system, there's mutual checks and balances. Thinking about it the other way around, there are excuses for passing the buck in a multi-person system, but a dictatorship by one person isn't necessarily more reliable. If you're attracted by the story background, then you're already at a disadvantage... Breaking the trust chain is unavoidable regardless of how many people are making decisions. The key still depends on whether these people are capable or not. Really? Then I dare not touch it even more... Do you regret after rushing in, bro?
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployervip
· 01-12 00:48
Claiming to be the "earliest" just by copying exchange designs? I've heard this spiel too many times; it's just a copycat.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 01-12 00:44
Haha, copying the exchange's design directly? That's a bold move. I have to say, this feels a bit off. Using the term "earliest" is even more incredible, it sounds like you're just gilding your own lily... Is the CTO making all the decisions? I don't quite agree with this logic; it easily leads to dictatorial decisions. The problem is, who takes the blame? Single point of failure risk is huge. Although a team system is slower, at least there's checks and balances. Don't get carried away by the story. Wait, are you really testing this project or just pretending? What happened to this kind of project in the end? Just asking for an update.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 01-12 00:29
Just copying design elements and claiming "the earliest adoption"? I've seen this trick too many times. Speaking of which, it's even more dangerous when the CTO makes all the decisions alone— isn't that a single point of failure? I really can't understand how some people think team collaboration increases trust costs... Copying marketing tricks is one thing, but relying on stories to attract people— I don't touch these kinds of projects. Wait, do you really believe that one person's decision-making is more transparent? That's just naive.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 01-12 00:27
Is claiming to be the earliest just because you designed an exchange? That logic is a bit ridiculous, it feels like a shell game. Single-person decision-making sounds great, but who takes the blame if something goes wrong? This theory is easy to fail in practice. There are many promising projects on Solana, but very few actually survive... By the way, how much did you invest in this round? Team-based systems are indeed prone to disputes, but relying on a single decision-maker isn't necessarily safer; it might even make you more vulnerable to being exploited. I've heard the claim of "being the earliest" so many times, but in the end, don't you know how it all turned out?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)