Whatever, dev PNL. When you build in crypto, sometimes the returns just don't match the effort—but that's the game we signed up for.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 01-13 05:05
Developers losing money is the norm, what is there to say?
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 01-12 21:14
Returns can't keep up with investments, that's the norm in crypto. When buying the dip, you pile up blood sacrifices, but when it rises, it gets cut in half, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 01-12 00:56
Speaking of which, if we're going to do this, we need to think openly—there's an imbalance between effort and reward. Who doesn't know that?
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 01-12 00:55
Forget it, it's the developer's fate. In crypto, the rewards are never proportional to the effort... but who made us like this vibe?
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-12 00:54
Luban No.7 is under construction again, with a serious mismatch between input and output... Things that should theoretically be feasible are like this, with maximum academic value and minimum practical value.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-12 00:42
Developer PNL is like this; I'm used to it long ago. In the crypto world, moving bricks for a year doesn't even earn a fraction of a model training, but who made us greedy for this?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 01-12 00:38
Forget it, let's just leave it at that. Who hasn't lost money doing on-chain development? The effort and the rewards are never proportional... but we all know this is just how crypto is.
Whatever, dev PNL. When you build in crypto, sometimes the returns just don't match the effort—but that's the game we signed up for.